We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 214

What you need to know about Ohio’s response to Kelo

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 1 2007

In the United States, the power of eminent domain the government’s right to take private property for public use upon reasonable payment to the property’s owner has always operated within strict parameters

Postponed possession order following drug convictions

  • Cobbetts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 24 2008

The housing team recently acted on behalf of a Midlands-based local authority in bringing a possession claim against a 26-year-old man following convictions related to possession of drugs and complaints of anti-social behaviour

R (on the application of Kevin Lewis) v (1) Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council (2) Persimmon Homes (Teeside) Ltd (2009)

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 27 2009

The Court of Appeal has dismissed the latest legal appeal in the long-running litigation concerning part of the site for a multimillion pound leisure and housing regeneration in Redcar

New Jersey Supreme Court limits application of blight designation in ongoing national debate over eminent domain

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 22 2007

In a potential blow to municipalities seeking to redevelop "underutilized" properties, the New Jersey Supreme Court has held that a municipality's designation of a property as blighted and subject to the municipality's power of eminent domain based solely upon a finding that the property is not being utilized in a fully productive manner (i.e., "not fully productive use"), without producing evidence that the condition was due to conditions of title or diversity of ownership, is invalid

Why the Tsilhqot'in case should be appealed

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 17 2008

Unresolved issues concerning Aboriginal rights and title are creating problems for the business community across Canada

Nevada joins national trend in responding to Kelo decision on eminent domain

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2007

On May 23, 2007, Nevada Governor Jim Gibbons signed into law Assembly Bill No. 102 ("AB102"), a reform measure seeking to curb perceived abuses of the power of eminent domain in response to the U.S. Supreme Court's Kelo decision

Derbyshire Dales District Council and another v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another

  • RPC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 10 2009

The High Court has recently rejected a local authority’s appeal against a grant of planning permission for a wind turbine facility close to a national park

Case study 2 ASBO: Lambeth LBC -v- Assing

  • Cobbetts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 20 2007

In this case, Mr Assing had been a secure tenant of a flat for nine years

Case law update

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 31 2008

Blyth Valley Borough Council had adopted a 30 per cent affordable housing policy for all new developments in the borough providing ten or more homes

Follow your warrant policy

  • Cobbetts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 20 2007

In this case, the Court set aside a warrant after an eviction on the basis that Southwark LBC (the Council) had acted oppressively

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy