We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 12

Outcome of Lord Taylor's review of planning guidance

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 23 2013

CLG has published its response to the consultation on Lord Taylor's review of planning guidance. The upshot is that while most of the review's

Planning permission quashed due to last minute condition

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 16 2013

There has been an interesting case on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Habitats Regs Appropriate Assessment (AA). This is the case of

Judicial review in planning cases

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 23 2013

As we commented on this blog in December, the Ministry of Justice consulted on proposals to alter the procedures around JR challenges, including the

Validity of section 106 obligation

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 28 2013

There has been an interesting case decided this week on a point relating to the kind of "s 106 obligations" which satisfy the terms of s 106 itself

Affordable housing and mortgagee protection under s 106

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 13 2013

Followers of the Fox Strategic LandSandbach story will have seen published last week a "minded to allow" letter from the Secretary of State. This is

How to interpret the NPPF

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 22 2012

Greg Clark gave us some further guidance on how the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is meant to operate in his remarks in the House of Commons recently when he said that NPPF provides for a “localist approach” and should be seen as a framework in which local decisions can be taken

Emerging core strategy must be reconsidered

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 24 2012

There has been an interesting and well worth reading case involving a challenge to Basingstoke and Deane's emerging core strategy

A question of weight

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 2 2012

I was interested to see a news report earlier today about the outcome of the High Court challenge in the Sandbach decision

Intensification and material change of use

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 20 2012

The case of Herts County Council v SSCLG and Metal and Waste Recycling, decided on 1 February 2012, is a recent reminder of the difficulties inherent in proving a material change of use in the case of intensification

Section 106 on part only of a site

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 30 2011

The Hadley Homes, Kimberley Industrial Estate Walthamstow appeal decision (May 2011) makes essential reading for any applicantappellant preparing a s 106 (agreement or unilateral) where not all of the site is in hand