We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 311

Pa. Supreme Court denies equitable tolling of oil and gas lease’s primary term

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2015

Last week, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, on certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, ruled that the primary

Wind turbines planning application: noise investments and ‘financial involvement’

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 23 2015

A recent case, R (Joicey) v Northumberland County Council, is a reminder of the information that should be made available to the public in

Pennsylvania Superior Court: storage activities hold production rights under "dual purpose" lease

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 23 2015

The explosion of natural gas production in the Appalachian Basin in recent years has led to litigation involving landowners trying to get out of

Personal rights not an interest in WA land

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • February 19 2015

One of the vexing questions in duty laws is the scope of the definition of "land". Since land is a significant part of the duty base, either directly

Ohio’s appellate courts wrestle with oil and gas issues concerning domestic relations and dual-agent Realtors

  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 16 2015

We have spilled a lot of "digital ink" on this blog addressing how Ohio courts have confronted oil and gas disputes about Ohio's Dormant Mineral Act

Major verdict in electric utility easement case

  • Lewis Roca Rothgerber
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 13 2015

More than five years after starting in state court before later restarting in federal court, a federal court jury in Missouri has issued a major

Missouri federal court cuts claims in pipeline property damage action

  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 12 2015

Underscoring the need for plaintiffs to show concrete proof of harm in suits alleging property damage, a federal district court dismissed a suit

Pennsylvania Superior Court confirms “or” means “or”

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 10 2015

On February 4, 2015, less than one month after hearing oral argument on the matter, the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the April 2014 decision

Commercial property - winter 201415

  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 4 2015

Particularly with the scare stories circulating about fracking (although legally that is another kettle of fish entirely), it is inevitable that some

Court will not halt horizontal drilling operation to reach adjacent lessee’s land

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 3 2015

Using offsite locations for horizontal drilling is becoming increasingly popular as surface use becomes difficult. In Lightning Oil Inc. v. Anadarko