We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 4,187

Developers - keep building but don't run out of money!

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 10 2013

In Morris Homes (West Midlands) Ltd v Keay & Another, the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) considered a developer's obligations in an

Permitted development changes - to come into force on 30 May 2013

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 9 2013

CLG has announced today that it has laid draft secondary legislation (which I've yet to see), due to come into force on 30 May 2013, dealing with

Tenants and immigration status - how to respond?

  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 8 2013

For landlords and agents the Queen's speech contained a new and scary problem. This was the statement that a new bill would require private landlords

Rights to light- the great debate

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 25 2013

Rights to light have become an increasingly contentious and confusing area in recent years to the frustration of developers. The situation has not

Landlord wins Superstorm Sandy rent abatement suit

  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 8 2013

In what is believed to be the first decision in a commercial lease case arising out of the devastating losses to landlords and tenants from

Can there be Rylands v Fletcher liability for fire damage to a neighbouring property?

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 20 2012

Yes, but not often and not on the facts of Stannard (ta Wyvern Tyres) v Gore, 2012 EWCA Civ 1248

Do you mean what you say? What “without prejudice” and “subject to contract” really mean

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 10 2011

Practitioners and clients alike often receive correspondence which is marked with a heading, such as "without prejudice" or "subject to contract"

The Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 2 2013

The Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 ("the 2013 Act") received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013. As a Bill it was not referred to in the

Planning a planning judicial review? Better get your skates on!

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 3 2013

On 23 April, the Government announced proposals for the reform of the judicial review procedure, including eye-catching plans to slash the time limit

Court rejects business rates mitigation scheme

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 14 2013

The High Court has today rejected arguments on behalf of Public Safety Charitable Trust Limited (PSCT) that it was entitled to charitable relief from