We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 37

Commercial leases in bankruptcy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2012

The last several years have seen bankruptcy filings from prominent retail chains such as Borders, Circuit City, Blockbuster, Movie Gallery and Ritz Camera

New opponents to green buildings emerge

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2013

Recognition and incentives for green buildingsstructures and processes that are considered more socially responsible, environmentally

Coping with commercial leases in bankruptcy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2012

The last several years have seen bankruptcy filings from prominent retail chains such as Borders, Circuit City, Blockbuster, Movie Gallery and Ritz Camera

Sackett at the Supreme Court: a win for agency-regulated entities

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

On March 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that private land owners Michael and Chantell Sackett could bring an action challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) administrative compliance order under section 309 of the Clean Water Act (CWA

Bond exclusion and insured vs. insured exclusions bar coverage for claims against property management company

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

A California federal district court has held that a bond exclusion in a professional liability policy issued to a property management company and the

Condo owner's suit barred by property damage exclusion because it "arises out of" property damage

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2010

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, applying Florida law, held that coverage for a condominium owner's suit against a condominium association was barred by the policy's property damage exclusion because the suit arose out of physical damage to the condominium

Duty to defend not triggered by allegations outside professional services coverage

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2008

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado, applying Colorado law, has held that allegations in several lawsuits brought against a real estate investment trust did not trigger the insurer's duty to defend the trust under miscellaneous professional liability policies that covered the provision of professional services

Court rejects insurer’s attempt to rescind lawyer's policy and holds prior knowledge exclusion does not bar coverage

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2009

A federal district court has held that a law firm could not have reasonably foreseen that its client would file a malpractice suit against it when it applied for and obtained a renewal of its lawyers professional liability policy, concluding that the attempted real estate transaction giving rise to the suit was thwarted by the client’s own actionsnot the law firm’sand noting that the client continued to work with the firm in related litigation following the canceled transaction

Improper use of funds exclusion did not render coverage for escrow agent illusory

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2012

Applying Illinois law, a federal district court has held that a professional liability policy issued to an escrow agent did not afford coverage for claims alleging that the agent mishandled escrow funds by failing to disburse the funds to pay claimants’ property taxes and insurance premiums or to return the funds to claimants

Letters from claimant's counsel deemed to constitute "claims" despite absence of express request for relief

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 9 2010

The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, applying Minnesota law, has held that letters sent to an insured company by counsel retained by an injured party constituted "claims" and, that, because notice of those claims was not provided during the relevant claims-made policy period, the insurer had no obligation to defend or indemnify the company in connection with a subsequent lawsuit brought by the injured party