We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 24

Business law reform legal update

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • March 27 2013

In this update we summarise the outcome of a number of law reform projects from June 2012 to March 2013

Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust Funds: Supreme Court rejects proof of materiality at the class certification stage

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2013

On February 27, 2013, the Supreme Court held in a 6-3 opinion in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, 568 U.S. ___ (2013

Supreme Court issues major securities class action ruling

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 1 2013

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs in securities fraud cases do not have to establish materiality before a class can be certified

On the horizon for 2013

  • Dentons
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 17 2013

Our experts select the highlights likely to impact businesses in the UK generally, so you can check quickly

Court finds plaintiff's new evidence insufficient to satisfy PSLRA pleading requirements

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2012

In a securities fraud action, a Colorado district court denied a plaintiff employees’ retirement plan’s motion for relief from a final judgment that dismissed the plaintiff’s original complaint because it did not satisfy the pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA

Verbal warnings reinforce access to safe harbor protections

  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2012

As companies prepare for second quarter earnings calls, the following practice pointer highlights the value of verbal warnings in advance of statements concerning results

This week in securities litigation (week ending June 8, 2012)

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 8 2012

As the insider trading trial of a former Goldman director continued in Manhattan, another insider trading probe moved to the playing field, according to a Reuters report

General counsel update: 31 May 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 31 2012

This is the twenty-ninth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

SEC sues private company and its CEO for fraud related to buyback program involving employee stock bonus plan

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 29 2012

On December 12, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Stiefel Laboratories, a family-owned dermatological products business that was acquired by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in 2009, and against Charles Stiefel, the company’s former chairman and CEO

“What, me worry?” Yes, the securities laws apply to private companies!

  • Blank Rome LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2012

In a case that should serve as a warning to the owners, directors and officers of privately-held companies that offer equity plans to their employees, on December 12, 2011, the SEC filed suit against Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. (at the time of the alleged misconduct, the world’s largest privately held manufacturer of dermatology products and now a subsidiary of GlaxoSmithKline PLC) and Charles Stiefel, the then controlling shareholder, chairman and CEO

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy