We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Federal court decisions permit two Dodd-Frank whistleblower cases to proceed

  • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 11 2012

Two federal district courts recently issued decisions adopting a broad interpretation of the anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) and allowed Dodd-Frank whistleblower claims to proceed past motions to dismiss

Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation provision does not apply extraterritorially

  • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2012

On June 28, 2012, a Texas District Court held that the Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provision per se does not apply extraterritorially

First report of SEC's whistleblower office contains some surprises

  • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 28 2011

On November 16, 2011, the SEC's Office of the Whistleblower released its first annual report to Congress, as required by section 924(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act