We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

Sarbanes-Oxley “protected activity” wins a broad interpretation but is the decision faithful to congressional intent?

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2011

In a case packed with allegations of the kind rarely found beyond the script of a soap opera, the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) determined that protected activity under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) does not require a showing of fraud against shareholders

District court holds that Dodd-Frank whistleblower protection does not have extraterritorial reach--longstanding presumption against extraterritoriality may also apply to other statutes

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 5 2012

Global whistleblowers cannot look to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”) for protection against retaliation, according to a recent federal court decision