We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 37,724

EU Commission proposes to amend Shareholder Rights Directive

  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • April 15 2014

The European Commission (EU Commission) recently published a proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive (200736EC), which was adopted in

SEC brings enforcement actions against two audit committee chairs

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

During March, the SEC brought enforcement actions against the audit committee chairs of two public companies -- AgFeed Industries and L&L Energy. Both

RDR and adviser charging disclosures: FCA’s patience wearing thin?

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 15 2014

The Retail Distribution Review (RDR) introduced, among other things, new information disclosure requirements for financial advisers. Firms m

New capital markets law cracks down on insider trading and manipulation

  • Hergüner Bilgen Özeke
  • -
  • Turkey
  • -
  • April 15 2014

The new Capital Markets Law introduces broader and stricter redefined liability provisions when compared with the old legislation. In this respect

D.C. Circuit finds Conflicts Minerals Rules’ disclosure requirement unconstitutional; affirms district court’s decisions on de minimis exception, scope of application, and due-diligence trigger

  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

Yesterday a panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals held the Conflict Minerals Rules' requirement that a company that issues stock disclose if its

Court declares partial victory for manufacturers in conflict minerals case

  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

Yesterday a panel on the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, in National Association of Manufacturers v. SEC, held that one portion of the SEC's

Name and shame no more?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

The last few years has seen the rise of so-called "name and shame" laws. The aims of many these laws may be laudable, but yesterday's decision by the

Newsletter Finance and Capital Markets -1st Quarter 2014

  • Cuatrecasas Gonçalves Pereira
  • -
  • European Union, Portugal
  • -
  • April 15 2014

On 18 March, Decree-Law No. 402014 ("DL 402014") has been published aimed at guaranteeing the enactment and the implementation at a national level

Manufacturer's corner: SEC's final rule on conflict minerals partially stricken by D.C. Circuit

  • Spencer Fane Britt & Browne
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

We break from our ongoing series on implied warranties to notify you of a recent opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Understanding forex manipulation

  • Collyer Bristow LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 14 2014

Following on the heels of the LIBOR manipulation scandal, the latest allegation levelled at the banks is that they conspired to manipulate foreign