We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 23

Supreme Court allows favorable employer stock ruling to stand

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2012

The US Supreme Court recently declined to review the “stock drop” cases decided late last year by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit involving Citigroup and McGraw-Hill

Court finds plaintiff's new evidence insufficient to satisfy PSLRA pleading requirements

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2012

In a securities fraud action, a Colorado district court denied a plaintiff employees’ retirement plan’s motion for relief from a final judgment that dismissed the plaintiff’s original complaint because it did not satisfy the pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA

DOL revises its position on brokerage windows (again)

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 3 2012

The Department of Labor (DOL) continues to revise its stance on the disclosures plan sponsors must make to participants about brokerage windows

DOL issues direct final rule related to service provider disclosures

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2012

The United States Department of Labor (DOL) released a direct final rule on July 13, that amended the procedures retirement plan fiduciaries are to use for reporting a covered service provider’s (CSP’s) failure to furnish the newly required disclosures related to the CSP’s compensation and possible conflicts of interest

DOL finalizes investment advice guidance for 401(k) type plans

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 11 2011

The Department of Labor (the DOL) recently issued guidance that clarifies how advisers can provide investment advice to retirement plan participants in a manner that protects both the participant and the provider

DOL to revise definition of benefit plan "fiduciary"

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 23 2011

On September 19, the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced its intention to revise and re-propose amendments to its definition of “fiduciary.”

SEC proposes new marketing rules for target date retirement funds

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2010

The Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed amendments to multiple rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940 regarding the marketing of target date retirement funds

Target date retirement fund investor bulletin issued by DOL and SEC

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 26 2010

The Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have published a bulletin about target date retirement funds (also known as "life cycle funds") that is intended to help investors and plan participants understand and evaluate such investments

Target date retirement fund investor bulletin issued by DOL and SEC

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2010

The Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission have published a bulletin about target date retirement funds (also known as "life cycle funds") that is intended to help investors and plan participants understand and evaluate such investments

Last-misrepresentation theory did not render claims against all defendants timely

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2010

In Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Brant, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. asserted claims for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder against four of its former executives who received backdated stock options