Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 11-20 of 31
Ninth Circuit narrows scope of CFAA
- Thompson Hine LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 20 2012
On April 10, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision interpreting the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), in U.S. v. Nosal, 10-10038
Is Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for hackers only? Ninth Circuit says yes, and Supreme Court may have to make final call
- Constangy Brooks & Smith LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 19 2012
Employers looking to hold employees liable for misappropriation of trade secrets or violations of company computer policies under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act may have to find another avenue for relief
Ninth Circuit en banc decision in Nosal creates federal appellate court split on scope of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act's reach to protect trade secrets
- Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 16 2012
In a much anticipated decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in an en banc decision in United States v. Nosal that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ("CFAA") was not intended to cover employee misappropriation of trade secrets, violations of corporate computer use policies or violations of an employee duty of loyalty
Got forensics? The use of digital forensics in trade secret matters
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 2 2012
In today’s world, the amount of communication is astronomical
Reverse engineering software, without more, not trade secret misappropriation in California
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- March 30 2012
The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held that reverse engineering software in violation of a form end-user license agreement, without more, did not rise to the level of trade secret misappropriation
Connecticut Supreme Court rules that a public agency can create and maintain trade secrets
- Epstein Becker Green
- -
- USA
- -
- March 16 2012
The Supreme Court of Connecticut has ruled that a public agency, the University of Connecticut, can create and maintain trade secrets that are exempt from disclosure under the state’s Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”
Data preservation is critical in trade secrets cases
- Littler Mendelson
- -
- USA
- -
- February 27 2012
In a recent trade secrets case, Amron International Diving Supply, Inc. v. Hydrolinx Diving Communication, the defendant learned the hard way the serious consequences of failing to preserve evidence
Click wrap? Forget it: federal court finds that violation of online clickwrap agreement not enough to constitute trade secret misappropriation under California law
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 17 2012
On February 13, 2012, a federal judge in Los Angeles, California dismissed a remote-access software company’s claim that one of its customers violated the California Trade Secrets Act, Cal. Civ. Code 3426.1 et seq., by downloading a trial version of plaintiff’s Mac-environment remote-access software and “reverse engineering” its own program
Court of Appeal: no infringement by Samsung of Apple's tablet design
- NautaDutilh
- -
- Netherlands
- -
- January 25 2012
Yesterday the Court of Appeal of The Hague rendered its judgment in the AppleSamsung case on design right issues
Top 10 2011 developmentsheadlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- January 17 2012
We have compiled a list of the top 2011 developmentsheadlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Brian Hall (1)
- Daniel Joshua Salinas (2)
- David Clark (1)
- Elisabeth Malis Morgan (1)
- Jeff Neuburger (1)
- Jordi Masdevall (1)
- Kristen J Mathews (1)
- Michael Young (1)
- Peter A. Steinmeyer (2)
- Robert Milligan (2)
Firm Name
- Baker & McKenzie (1)
- CMS Cameron McKenna (1)
- Dechert LLP (1)
- Epstein Becker Green (3)
- Littler Mendelson (2)
- McDermott Will & Emery (3)
- NautaDutilh (1)
- Proskauer Rose LLP (1)
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP (6)
- Speechly Bircham (1)
