We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 31

New York State court rejects double jeopardy argument in data theft case

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

We have previously written about Sergey Aleynikov, a former computer programmer for an investment bank who beat federal charges of trade secret theft

New U.S. laws criminalize theft of quantitative trading and investment models and other trade secrets and dramatically increase potential monetary penalties for thefts which benefit non-U.S. entities

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2013

The U.S. Congress recently passed two laws that raise the stakes dramatically for employees of financial services firms and anyone else who

IP snapshot - January 2013

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 25 2013

The CJEU has given its long-awaited and much-anticipated decision in the ONELOMEL case, which turned on the issue of the extent of geographical use

Discovery of information on personal devices still at issue in trade secret disputes

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

In trade secret litigation, we often seek to uncover whether a former employee has taken confidential trade secret information and stored it on a

Top 10 developmentsheadlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law in 2012

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 31 2012

As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developmentsheadlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012

Samsung v Apple CA upholds HHJ Birss’ “too cool” ruling

  • Speechly Bircham
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 31 2012

Following on from our article “the iPad is too cool for the Galaxy” in July’s Newswire the Court of Appeal (CA) have upheld HHJ Birss’ ruling finding that the three Samsung Galaxy models 10.1, 8.9 and 7.7 did not infringe Apple’s registered community design number: 000181607-0001 (see below

Apple loses appeal on “cool” design

  • Carpmaels & Ransford
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 31 2012

The Court of Appeal of England and Wales has issued a further ruling in the much-publicised infringement battle between Samsung and Apple

California court affirms that customer lists can qualify as trade secrets

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 24 2012

Under California’s trade secret laws, a trade secret is information that (a) is not generally known in the industry, to the public, or to others who can realize economic value from its disclosure or use; (b) has independent economic value that derives from its secrecy; and (c) is subject to reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy

The use of digital forensics in trade secret matters

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2012

Welcome to part 3 of this three part series

Washington court clarifies pleading requirements for CFAA claims

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2012

Trade secret disputes increasingly center on an ex-employee copying trade secret information from the former employer’s computer system and using that information to benefit his or her new employer