We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,168

Federal Circuit upholds ITC’s authority to enforce consent order covering third-party products

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC, the

Diaper maker’s patent claims soiled by delay

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

This case relates to adult incontinence products. The district court, based on a delay of more than six-years in filing the lawsuit, held that the

Not all vice presidents are officers and entitled to corporate indemnification

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

Addressing the meaning of the term “officer” in a company’s bylaws, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated a district court’s summary

Parliament of Canada introduces Bill C-43: incorporating the Patent Law Treaty and the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs into Canadian law

  • Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 28 2014

On October 23, 2014, the Government of Canada introduced and moved for first reading of Bill C-43, A Second Act to Implement Certain Provisions of

Court crushes Krush’s motions for preliminary injunction on patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 27 2014

Krush Communications, LLC ("Krush") brought suit in New Jersey in 2013 against Lunex Telecom, Inc., a Georgia corporation ("Lunex"), for patent

Amendments to the Design Protection Act

  • Yoon & Yang LLC
  • -
  • South Korea
  • -
  • October 27 2014

New amendments (the "Amendment") to the Design Protection Act (the "Act") became effective on July 1, 2014.The Amendment aims to provide greater

Common sense - businesses need to take steps to protect their confidential information

  • Greensfelder Hemker & Gale PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 27 2014

A recent decision from the Seventh Circuit is a reminder that if a business wants trade secret protection for certain information, it must actually

Downloading information from your old employer? Beware, it could be a costly exercise!

  • Holman Webb
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • October 27 2014

On 23 October 2014 the Federal Court of Australia handed down a decision that dealt with the downloading of software by an employee immediately

Parliament introduces Bill c-43: incorporating the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs and the Patent Law Treaty into Canadian law

  • Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 24 2014

On October 23, 2014, Canadian Minister of Finance Joe Oliver introduced and moved for first reading of Bill C-43, A Second Act to Implement Certain

Bill C-43: how the new omnibus budget bill may effect Canadian patent and industrial design law

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 24 2014

On October 23, 2014, the Canadian Federal government introduced Bill C-43, an omnibus budget bill also known as the Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No