We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,271

ACIP’s review of the designs systems proposes three approaches to reform

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • January 21 2015

In 2012, the Advisory Council on Intellectual Property (ACIP) was tasked by the Government with conducting a review of the operation and

Think twice again: are you implementing adequate measures to protect your trade secrets? Actions speak louder than words

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2015

In the last post, I wrote about the importance of ensuring that you take adequate measures to protect your valuable trade secrets. I discussed a case

EU Trade Secrets Directive European Parliament starts discussions

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 19 2015

The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs Agreement), which came into force in 1995, requires the WTO members

Chicago court hands out harsh sentences for hedge fund trade secret theft

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 15 2015

United States of America v. Yihao Pu et al., Case No. 1:11-cr-00699 (N.D. Ill.) Following earlier plea agreements, "Ben" Pu ("Pu") and Sahil

Are your LinkedIn connections trade secrets?

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 15 2015

LinkedIn burst onto the social network scene in 2003 and has quickly become an essential tool for the modern professional. Over 300 million

Ten actions you can take now to protect your company’s trade secrets action six: telecommuting employees out of sight shouldn’t be out of mind

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 15 2015

In this ten-post series, we have been talking about actions companies can take to better protect valuable trade secrets and other critical business

Confidentiality agreement not enough to protect confidential information

  • Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2015

Confidentiality agreements have become routine as a part of conducting business. Parties frequently exchange confidentiality agreements, or sign a

China

  • Peksung Intellectual Property Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • January 13 2015

Article 2(4) of the Patent Law defines a ‘design’ as the shape or pattern or a combination thereof, or the combination of colour with a shape or

Federal Circuit reverses lower court’s ruling that plaintiff’s trade secret misappropriation and conspiracy claims were untimely and unprovable

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

The Federal Circuit recently held that the dismissal of a trade secrets complaint for failure to state a justiciable claim was not warranted merely

China design practice guide 2015

  • Peksung Intellectual Property Ltd
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • January 9 2015

Article 2(4) of the Patent Law defines a ‘design’ as the shape or pattern or a combination thereof, or the combination of colour with a shape or