We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 13

Non-competes, trade secrets, and patents! Oh my!

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2010

In today's competitive business environment, it is imperative that companies take steps to protect their intellectual property, including trade secrets, customer relationships, proprietary computer software, and business methods

IP due diligences can benefit both parties in M&A transactions

  • ENS - Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs
  • -
  • South Africa
  • -
  • February 15 2011

With merger and acquisitions continuing to surge, a surprising number of transactions are concluded without any investigation into the target company's intellectual property (IP

Government responds to the Hargreaves Review

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 5 2011

The Government has published its response to Professor Ian Hargreaves' independent review of IP and growth, Digital Opportunity

IPOS seeks feedback on proposed miscellaneous changes to Singapore's Intellectual Property Acts and Rules

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • April 13 2012

From 21 March 2012 and 18 April 2012, the IPOS is seeking feedback on proposed miscellaneous amendments to Singapore's intellectual property ("IP") Acts and Rules

One size doesn’t fit all

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

Design patents, trade dress and copyrights each have different requirements, resulting in the need for a multi-faceted approach

IP snapshot - January 2013

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 25 2013

The CJEU has given its long-awaited and much-anticipated decision in the ONELOMEL case, which turned on the issue of the extent of geographical use

Intellectual property: commercial assets and tax relief

  • Dehns
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 1 2012

There's no hiding from the fact that companies with a reputation for innovation, such as Apple or Dyson, enjoy a higher valuation and healthier profit margins than might otherwise be expected

Intellectual property checklist

  • Blaney McMurtry LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 3 2011

Creative ideas in product development and marketing provide opportunities for a company to get ahead of the competition

IP Australia fee changes: patent continuation fees now due 4 years from filing

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 11 2012

IP Australia announced on 10 May 2012 that changes to official fees for Australian patents, trade marks, designs and plant breeders rights will become effective in most cases from 1 July 2012, although new application filing fees will not change until 1 October 2012

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Bill 2011 introduced into the Senate

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 28 2011

On 22 June 2011 the much anticipated “Raising the Bar Bill” was introduced into the Senate

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy