We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 14

Apple continues to fight for iPhone trademark in Brazil

  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • -
  • Brazil, USA
  • -
  • February 14 2013

Yesterday, Brazil's National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) rejected Apple's trademark application for iPhone for use in connection with

Apple v. Samsung: Apple's redress does not include re-dress; injunction for trade dress dilution denied based on application of eBay rule

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 8 2013

In August 2012, the jury in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, 5:11-CV-01846, returned

District court continues to prohibit the "reflashing" or "unlocking" of cellular devices

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 19 2012

The U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida recently ruled that the unauthorized "unlocking" or "reflashing" of cellular devices, a process that

Broadband news

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2012

On April 23, 2012, the parties to the Open Internet appeal filed a joint motion with a proposed briefing schedule

“Just say no to ‘CRACKBERRY’”

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2012

In a precedential opinion, the United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) sustained three opposition proceedings based on grounds of likelihood of confusion, and four opposition proceedings based on grounds of likelihood of dilution by blurring, in favor of Research in Motion Ltd. (RIM), the maker of BLACKBERRY-brand mobile devices

CrackBerry crackdown: trademark board not a fan of fan-created nickname

  • Lewis and Roca LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2012

Everybody knows somebody who seems physically unable to peel his eyes away from his smart phone screen for longer than two seconds, regardless of his visibly offended dinner company or the swerving and honking of oncoming traffic

The BlackBerry might be addictive, but don't call it a Crackberry

  • Weintraub Genshlea Chediak Law Corporation
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2012

So many of us have become hopelessly addicted to our Blackberry smartphones and personal messaging devices that the devices are frequently referred to as “Crackberries.”

Technology annual review of 2011

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 29 2012

The year began as it meant to go on - with a high profile patent dispute in the mobile phone sector decided in the Court of Appeal

Court denies Apple, Inc. a preliminary injunction to protect its APP STORE mark

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 25 2011

In a decision that may have surprised many observers, in July 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied Apple, Inc.'s (Apple) motion for a preliminary injunction that would have prohibited Amazon.com, Inc.'s (Amazon) use of the APP STORE mark to sell applications for Android mobile devices

Computer developer in Madison, Wisconsin

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2011

MicroBlade, LLC recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and, although no sale has been announced, the Debtor’s assets may be available for acquisition under the right circumstances

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy