We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

The orange ambush of the World Cup

  • Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
  • -
  • South Africa, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 22 2010

The two women who are alleged to have organised the stunt were charged with contravening South Africa's Merchandise Marks Act and could now face jail sentences of up to six months

Olympic crackdown on ambush marketing

  • Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 18 2010

Sports sponsorship is big business and, having invested millions, sponsors are keen to ensure that their competitors cannot usurp benefits by insinuating association with "their" event

But it's the store where I buy my apps why can't I call it the App Store?

  • Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2011

To many people, and in particular those who own Apple products, the App Store is where consumers who own Apple products go to purchase applications for their hardware

Bravemarks is it brave to copy Disney?

  • Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 12 2012

The success of Disney’s latest movie “Brave” in its opening weekend will be surprising to few

These are not just any flowers, these are Interflora flowers; or are they?

  • Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 18 2011

Following on from the Advocate General’s opinion in the case of Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer plc and Flowers Direct online (the “Interflora case”), as covered in the March edition of our IP e-bulletin, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment on 22 September 2011