We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 293

Domain name dispute resolution in India

  • Ranjan Narula Associates
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • April 19 2012

In addition to a clear ‘.in’ Domain Dispute Resolution Policy, the courts have laid down some consistent guidelines for the treatment of domain name disputes

Gucci America, Inc. v. Frontline Processing Corp.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2010

Court denies defendants’ motion to dismiss in trademark infringement action against companies that allegedly established credit card processing services used to complete the online sales of fake Gucci items

Mere accessibility of alleged confusingly similar website in Illinois does not satisfy Calder "expressly aimed" test

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 8 2010

Mobile Anesthesiologists Chicago ("Chicago") provides on-site anesthesia services, is based in Chicago, has been in business for 15 years, registered the website www.mobileanesthesiologists.com, registered Mobile Anesthesiologists as a federal trademark, and has affiliate offices in other U.S. cities, including Houston

Enforcement of intellectual property rights in the context of the opening to competition of online gambling in France

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • France
  • -
  • October 14 2010

As online gambling in France is opening to competition, sports associations, corporations and organizations are seeking to secure their intellectual property rights protecting their names and the names of the competitions they organize and redouble their efforts against bookmakers who are using the names

Grohe's trademarks infringed by domain name grohekranenshop.nl - District Court of The Hague, Decisions of 2 Ceptember 2010

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • Netherlands
  • -
  • October 14 2010

The provisions judge of the District Court of The Hague ruled that the domain name grohekranenshop.nl held by R&M Company (R&M) infringed Grohe AG's trade name and trademarks

Second Circuit reverses Chloé v. Queen Bee - finds personal jurisdiction over internet counterfeiter

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 10 2010

The Second Circuit has reversed the controversial decision in the Chloé v. Queen Bee case, in which the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York refused to exercise jurisdiction over an Internet counterfeiter located in California (Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC, 571 F.Supp.2d 518 (S.D.N.Y.2008

EDVA, Judge Lee release memorandum opinion in Rosetta Stone v. Google trademark infringement case

  • Williams Mullen
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2010

On August 3, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of the Eastern District of Virginia issued his much-anticipated memorandum opinion in Rosetta Stone v. Google, revealing the reasoning behind his award of summary judgment to defendant Google on counts of, inter alia, direct, contributory, and vicarious trademark infringement

French court chips away at immunity for third-party content

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • France
  • -
  • August 7 2010

On July 20, a regional French appeals court ruled that eBay International and eBay France were liable for an eBay vendor's sale of counterfeit goods

Google wins major victory on sale of trademarks as keywords

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 13 2010

A federal court recently held that Google's auctioning of Rosetta Stone's trademarks as triggers for paid advertisements and the use of those trademarks within the advertisements creates no likelihood of confusion and therefore does not infringe

Online infringement a private affair

  • Luzzatto & Luzzatto Patent Attorneys
  • -
  • Israel
  • -
  • December 22 2010

As the Internet becomes increasingly popular, online trademark infringement is becoming more common