We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Domain name squatting to gain leverage can trigger "bad faith intent" in an ACPA claim

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2014

A required element to sustain a claim under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection (ACPA) (15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(A)) is proof that the

Third-party service providers not liable for contributory trademark infringement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 10 2013

Trademark owners frustrated by cybersquatting will not be able to sue third-party service providers for contributory infringement, according to a

Facebook sufficiently pleads Lanham Act claims against Teachbook

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 23 2012

Judge Aspen denied defendant Teachbook’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Facebook’s Lanham Act complaint

No personal jurisdiction based upon a passive website and a single advertisement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 3 2012

Judge Pallmeyer granted defendants PSMJ Resources' ("PSMJ") and Oser Communications' ("Oser") motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in this Lanham Act case involving plaintiff Modern Trade Communications' ("MTC") rights in its Metal Construction News mark for a metal industry trade publication

Court lacks jurisdiction over contract case "artfully plead" in trademark

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2011

Judge Gottschall granted defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction