We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 511

APP STORE not capable of distinguishing

  • Allens
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 12 2014

Justice Yates of the Federal Court has declared that the words APP STORE are not to any extent capable of distinguishing Apple Inc.'s retail

Landmark judgment orders ISPs to block access to websites advertising and selling counterfeit goods

  • Matheson
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 12 2014

Courts in Europe are well used to the music and film industries seeking orders blocking access to websites on the basis of copyright infringement. Now

The end of the road for counterfeit products?

  • Eversheds LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 9 2014

The High Court has granted orders requiring several internet service providers to block access by their subscribers to certain websites that

IP industry summary: typosquatter uses famous mark to direct business to his pornography sites; Southern District of California shuts him down

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 8 2014

Shutterstock Inc. has received a default judgment against Norbert Pikulski in the Southern District of California, including an award of $23,500 in

Avoiding trade mark infringement in Search Engine Optimisation

  • Fisher Adams Kelly
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 4 2014

For most businesses, the prominence of their website in search engine results has become an important part of their marketing efforts. The incentive

The thorny issue of keyword advertising: Interflora and M&S dispute set for retrial

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 3 2014

Last year, we brought you news of Interflora's victory against Marks & Spencer ("M&S") in a keyword advertising dispute where M&S were found liable

Interflora v M&S: the Google Ad words dispute rages on

  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 2 2014

Whilst this decision by the Court of Appeal has not brought an end to the long running trade mark battle about M&S’s use of Interflora based keywords

AdWords and third party trademarks: the Enterprise Matters section of the Milan Court rules in the wake of the ECJ’s case-law

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • European Union, Italy
  • -
  • December 1 2014

The use of third party trademarks as "ad-words" in order to gain advantageous referencing in Internet searches does not necessarily constitute

English High Court orders ISPs to block counterfeit goods websites

  • FRKelly
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 1 2014

On 17 October 2014, the English High Court ruled that trade mark proprietors can obtain court orders obliging Internet Service Providers ("ISPs") to

AdWords e marchi di terzi: il Tribunale di Milano sulla SCIA della Corte di Giustizia UE

  • Martini Manna Avvocati
  • -
  • Italy
  • -
  • November 27 2014

L'utilizzo del marchio di terzi come "parola chiave", ai fini di un posizionamento vantaggioso tra i risultati delle ricerche in Internet, non