We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 15

Further CJEU guidance on keyword advertising and trade mark infringement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 3 2011

In (1) Interflora Inc. (2) Interflora British Unit v (1) Marks & Spencer plc (2) Flowers Direct Online Ltd, Case C-32309 (22 September 2011), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has provided further guidance on circumstances in which use of a registered trade mark as a keyword by a third party advertiser may constitute trade mark infringement

Is a trade mark infringed by failure to identify the repackager of a parallel import?

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Denmark, European Union
  • -
  • November 29 2011

In Orifarm AS and Paranova Danmark AS v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp joined cases C-40009 and C-20710 28 July 2011 (unreported), the Supreme Court in Denmark sought clarification as to the applicability of the exhaustion of rights principle in relation to parallel imports

Application for advertising slogan rejected as not indicating commercial origin

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 8 2014

In Deutsche Bank AG v OHIM 2014 T-29112, the EU General Court has found that the protection of an advertising slogan as a Community trade mark

Court of Justice of the European Union provides ruling on keyword jurisdiction

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • April 30 2012

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), in Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH C-52310, has ruled that under Article 5(3) of the Brussels Regulation, an advertiser that uses a keyword that infringes a national trade mark on a country-specific top-level domain (TLD) of a Member State other than the Member State where the national trade mark is registered, can be sued in its Member State of establishment

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB v OHIM: movement mark and graphic representation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 25 2011

Sony sought to register the mark illustrated below as a Community Trade Mark (CTM), filing during prosecution a written description of the mark's movement

EU General Court finds use of CTM by intermediary to be “outward” and genuine

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 22 2014

In Recaro Holding GmbH v OHIM 2013 T-52412, the EU General Court upheld a decision by the Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonization for the

Advocate general considers jurisdiction for claims of infringement of a national trade mark online

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 30 2012

In Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH C-52310 (Opinion of Advocate General) 16 February 2012, Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalón considered that the proprietor of a national trade mark may be able to bring an infringement action in the Member State of registration against a third party that has registered a keyword used on a national search engine that is identical to the mark

General Court upholds OHIM refusal of CTM application for shape of loudspeaker

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • November 29 2011

In Bang & Olufsen AS v OHIM T-50808 6 October 2011 (unreported), the General Court upheld a decision by the Office of Harmonization for the Internal Market (OHIM) refusing Bang & Olufsen’s Community trade mark (CTM) application for the shape of a loudspeaker, on the grounds that the mark consisted exclusively of the shape, which gave substantial value to the goods

Registrability of marks containing geographical indications of origin

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, Finland
  • -
  • November 3 2011

“Cognac” as a geographical indication (GI) cannot be used in a trade mark of a spirit drink not covered by that GI, as the commercial use of such a mark would harm the protected indication

Top jeans brand 7 For All Mankind could lose right to branded accessories over distinctiveness of “seven”

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • November 29 2011

In Seven SpA v OHIM T-17610 6 October 2011 (unreported) the General Court annulled decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonization for the Internal Market (OHIM) that rejected an opposition against the mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND on the basis that the Board had erred in finding that there was no similarity between that mark and earlier composite marks featuring predominantly the word “seven”