We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 13

EU General Court confirms no proof of genuine use of earlier trade mark in CTM opposition

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • December 16 2013

In Biotronik SE & Co. KG v OHIM, Case T-41611 the EU General Court upheld a decision of the Board of Appeal and rejected an opposition to a

EU General Court finds use of CTM by intermediary to be “outward” and genuine

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 22 2014

In Recaro Holding GmbH v OHIM 2013 T-52412, the EU General Court upheld a decision by the Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonization for the

Codorniu Napa Inc v OHIM: figurative marks, wine and likelihood of confusion

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 25 2011

In Codorniu Napa Inc v the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) T-3508 23 November 2010 (unreported

Is a trade mark infringed by failure to identify the repackager of a parallel import?

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Denmark, European Union
  • -
  • November 29 2011

In Orifarm AS and Paranova Danmark AS v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp joined cases C-40009 and C-20710 28 July 2011 (unreported), the Supreme Court in Denmark sought clarification as to the applicability of the exhaustion of rights principle in relation to parallel imports

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB v OHIM: movement mark and graphic representation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 25 2011

Sony sought to register the mark illustrated below as a Community Trade Mark (CTM), filing during prosecution a written description of the mark's movement

Advocate general considers jurisdiction for claims of infringement of a national trade mark online

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 30 2012

In Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH C-52310 (Opinion of Advocate General) 16 February 2012, Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalón considered that the proprietor of a national trade mark may be able to bring an infringement action in the Member State of registration against a third party that has registered a keyword used on a national search engine that is identical to the mark

General Court upholds OHIM refusal of CTM application for shape of loudspeaker

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • November 29 2011

In Bang & Olufsen AS v OHIM T-50808 6 October 2011 (unreported), the General Court upheld a decision by the Office of Harmonization for the Internal Market (OHIM) refusing Bang & Olufsen’s Community trade mark (CTM) application for the shape of a loudspeaker, on the grounds that the mark consisted exclusively of the shape, which gave substantial value to the goods

Top jeans brand 7 For All Mankind could lose right to branded accessories over distinctiveness of “seven”

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • November 29 2011

In Seven SpA v OHIM T-17610 6 October 2011 (unreported) the General Court annulled decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonization for the Internal Market (OHIM) that rejected an opposition against the mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND on the basis that the Board had erred in finding that there was no similarity between that mark and earlier composite marks featuring predominantly the word “seven”

Registrability of marks containing geographical indications of origin

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, Finland
  • -
  • November 3 2011

“Cognac” as a geographical indication (GI) cannot be used in a trade mark of a spirit drink not covered by that GI, as the commercial use of such a mark would harm the protected indication

CJEU considers effect of honest concurrent use in Budweiser reference

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 3 2011

In Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch, Inc, C- 48209 (22 September 2011), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that both Anheuser-Busch and Budvar can continue to use the BUDWEISER trade mark in the United kingdom as there had been a long period of honest concurrent use