We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 225

Better late than never 20 years after the popularization of the worldwide web, a court finally recognizes trade dress rights in website design

  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2014

A website's distinctive appearance, layout, and design qualitiesits "look and feel"are often the most important and effective tools

“Look and feel” of a website can constitute protectable trade dress

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2014

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Ingrid & Isabel, LLC v. Baby Be Mine, LLC, --- F. Supp. 3d ----, 2014 WL

Website owners may allege protectable trade dress in their website design

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2014

The Central District of California joins a handful of courts in acknowledging that the appearance of a website may be entitled to trade dress

Google a verb and a trade mark

  • ENSafrica
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2014

Trade mark lawyers will tell you that you should never use your trade mark as a verb, or allow others to do so. Why? Because, it's the first step on

Confused? I was briefly, but not now!

  • ENSafrica
  • -
  • European Union, South Africa, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • October 7 2014

The fact that there were two separate articles in the most recent issue of a leading IP publication on 'initial interest confusion' reflects the

Arizona Court rules “Google” not a generic term

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 25 2014

"Google" and the verb "Googling" are not generic terms, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona has ruled. See Elliot v. Google

“Candy Crush Saga” developer denied bid to crush website candycrush-cheats.com

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 18 2014

A website providing tips and tricks for navigating the popular smartphone game "Candy Crush Saga" lives on, despite the game developer's efforts to

Surviving a trademark opposition challenge: do you have a true "intent-to-use"? 5 key tips

  • DLA Piper LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 10 2014

Unlike the vast majority of jurisdictions around the world, under the US Trademark Act, only someone "who has a bona fide intention, under

Coinye West will not take over Bitcoin’s reign on cryptocurrency

  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2014

There's exciting news in the world of cryptocurrency, the exchange medium that uses cryptography to secure the transactions and control the creation

“CloudTV” is held to be generic and fully available for use

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2014

ActiveVideo Networks sought to register CLOUDTV for interactive, television content-based services offered by cable and satellite television