We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Searching for answers over keyword searches: CDA blocks state law IP claims

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2014

By now, most consumers are familiar with those sponsored links that appear on Yahoo!, Google, or Bing after they search for something on the Internet

Amerigas settles with Opinion Corp, ending battle over “Pissed Consumer” site

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 28 2013

In a recent case, a national propane supplier reached a settlement with an online consumer complaint website, ending a dispute over deceptive

Louboutin loses preliminary injunction against Yves Saint Laurent

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2011

Christian Louboutin, maker of the famous red-soled heels, was denied a preliminary injunction by Judge Victor Marrero in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York

Louboutin continues fight to be sole owner of red-soled shoes

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 26 2011

Christian Louboutin, maker of high-end shoes famously known for their red soles, has returned to court to request an injunction to keep Christian Dior from debuting crimson shoes with soles to match

Levi Strauss pockets a win in Ninth Circuit trademark dilution case

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 14 2011

On February 8, 2011, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in Levi Strauss v. Abercrombie & Fitch that a trademark owner need not demonstrate that a defendant’s mark is “identical or nearly identical” to the owner’s mark in order to prove a claim of trademark dilution by blurring under federal law