We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 50

Domain name squatting to gain leverage can trigger "bad faith intent" in an ACPA claim

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2014

A required element to sustain a claim under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection (ACPA) (15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(A)) is proof that the

Court spares third-party service providers from contributory trademark infringement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2014

Trademark owners frustrated by cybersquatting will not be able to sue third-party service providers for contributory infringement, according to a new

Third-party service providers not liable for contributory trademark infringement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 10 2013

Trademark owners frustrated by cybersquatting will not be able to sue third-party service providers for contributory infringement, according to a

TRO partially delegated for impending trade show

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 4 2013

Judge Zagel granted in part plaintiff Dental USA’s motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction in this trademark and design patent

District court reaffirms that service provider will be granted immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2013

Via Section 230, the Communications Decency Act (CDA) provides broad immunity for service providers, hosts and website operators for claims stemming

Limited generic use does not render a mark generic

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 19 2013

Judge Darrah denied defendant Facebook’s summary judgment motion arguing that plaintiff Timeline’s TIMELINE trademark was generic or descriptive, and

Preliminary injunction partially entered in trademark suit

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

Judge Kapala granted the agreed portions of plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction in this trademark case involving plaintiff’s 21ST CENTURY

Inadvertent use of mark violates consent order

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2013

Judge Bucklo granted plaintiff Gaither Tool’s motion to enforce the parties’ Consent Order which required that defendant Summit Tool not use the

Religious institutions update: January 2013

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 4 2013

In 2000, Congress enacted the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000cc et seq. (RLUIPA), in recognition that "new, small, or

“Special sharing” allows claims against corporate officer

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2013

Judge Finnegan denied individual defendant Lang’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & (6) motion to dismiss this Lanham Act suit. Lang argued that plaintiff Lang