We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 44

Preliminary injunction partially entered in trademark suit

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

Judge Kapala granted the agreed portions of plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction in this trademark case involving plaintiff’s 21ST CENTURY

Seventh Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 7 2011

Judge St. Eve denied plaintiff Pousen Rosen's ("Poulsen") Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the Court's decision dismissing the case as to the individual defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction in this Lanham Act case

Laches claims generally not grounds for dismissal

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

Judge Kennelly granted in part defendants’ (collectively “L&P”) motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims in this Lanham Act case in this dispute regarding trademarked bratwurst

Likelihood of confusion not conducive to summary judgment

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2012

Judge Coleman denied plaintiffs summary judgment as to their Lanham Act infringement, deceptive trade practices and unfair competition claims

Unrebutted local Rule 56.1 statement leads to summary judgment

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2012

7-Eleven, Inc

Determining senior user is not an issue for motion to dismiss

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2012

Judge Der-Yeghiayan granted plaintiffs' motion to dismiss defendants' counterclaims and denied Moderna's motion to dismiss Arcadia's claims in this Lanham Act case involving Arcadia's TOPSHOP and Moderna's TOP SHOP TV marks

No personal jurisdiction based upon a passive website and a single advertisement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 3 2012

Judge Pallmeyer granted defendants PSMJ Resources' ("PSMJ") and Oser Communications' ("Oser") motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in this Lanham Act case involving plaintiff Modern Trade Communications' ("MTC") rights in its Metal Construction News mark for a metal industry trade publication

Affirmative defenses must meet pleading requirements

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2012

Judge Guzman granted in part plaintiffs' (collectively "Persis") Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) motion to strike defendant Burgett's affirmative defenses in this Lanham Act case involving the mark SOHMER

Unfair competition not preempted by Lanham Act

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 21 2012

Judge Guzman granted in part plaintiffs' (collectively "Persis") motion to dismiss defendant Burgett's counterclaim in this Lanham Act case involving the SOHMER mark

Facebook sufficiently pleads Lanham Act claims against Teachbook

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 23 2012

Judge Aspen denied defendant Teachbook’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Facebook’s Lanham Act complaint