We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-1 of 1

Florida court rules infringement claim is not Sizzlin.

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 12 2012

The Middle District of Florida ruled that a former Western Sizzlin licensee, operating in the same building and under the new name of “Sizzlin Grill” was not liable for trademark infringement based on: (1) changes to restaurants name and signage, (2) alterations to the exterior and interior of the restaurant, and (3) changes to the restaurants operations