We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 134

Lies, damned lies and social media coverage of trade mark disputes the TV programme previously known as “GLEE”?

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 24 2014

Remember when you could rely on social media for fair, unbiased and objective coverage of the news? Me neither

Perfect your foreign trademark rights early or risk losing them forever

  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • July 22 2014

On July 18th a U.K. Judge ruled that Twentieth Century Fox Films must change the name of its television show, "Glee", because it infringes the name

Trademarks in sport

  • EIP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 17 2014

A strong brand, and trademark protection, create business value. Indeed, intellectual property can become a company's most valuable asset. Branding

Publicity orders and Lush -v- Amazon

  • Wedlake Bell
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 9 2014

We have previously commented on the High Court's judgment in the Lush -v- Amazon trade mark case (see

Copycat packaging - brand owners sharpen their claws in the fight against lookalikes

  • D Young & Co
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 8 2014

Manufacturers and retailers have long battled the problem of competitors, often deliberately, designing products with the same 'look and feel' (or

YouView facing a re-brand after High Court ruling on trademark infringement

  • EIP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 20 2014

In the latest decision of a long-running battle over use of the trademark "youview", the High Court issued a decision, this week, that may require

OHIM’s Boards of Appeal taking a hard line on absolute grounds, but is this on the right basis?

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 18 2014

Not so long ago, one could simply add a flourish to an entirely descriptive word in order to achieve registration without an objection based on

A take-off, not a rip-off

  • ENSafrica
  • -
  • South Africa, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 17 2014

The relationship between parody and IP rights comes up quite often. Just recently the Advocate General of Europe's highest court, the Court of

Letter from Europe - Interior designs

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 12 2014

Sometime after I’d piloted Wagamama to victory against the awful Rajamama copycat Indian-themed restaurant, my late friend Paul O’Farrell, who was

Lush v Amazon - online retailers: are your sponsored links squeaky clean?

  • D Young & Co
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 12 2014

The case of Cosmetic Warriors and Lush v Amazon has confirmed and clarified the recent cases of Google France, Interflora and L'Oreal v eBay