We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Intellectual Property & Technology Update Winter 2012

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • March 8 2012

Welcome to the Winter 2012 issue of "Intellectual Property & Technology Update," a quarterly publication prepared by the members of Squire Sanders' intellectual property and technology law practice

A team effort avoiding trademark troubles in advertising campaigns

  • World Trademark Review
  • -
  • China, European Union, USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

Trademark counsel should be consulted early so that potentially infringing elements can be identified and addressed before the campaign progresses

Don't snag your deals on traps laid for trolls

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

The issue of non-practicing entities has been back in the news again recently. During a Google hangout last week, President Barack Obama used strong

The confusion continues over key word confusion

  • Miller Canfield PLC
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • October 26 2012

In April 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit weighed in on the now long-running battle between Google and trademark owners

Time to be positive? Google’s AdWords policy in focus

  • Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • November 15 2010

Following its successful appearance before the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) earlier this year, Google recently announced sweeping changes to its AdWords policies in the European Union

US and European trademark practice compared

  • Venable LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • August 5 2011

Common law rights are strong in the US: This means that a registry clearance search will not guarantee that you will not be sued by a prior unregistered user