Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 10
Sarika Connoisseur Cafe Pte Ltd v Ferrero SpA
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- January 10 2013
Ferrero SPA (Ferrero) is the proprietor of various registered "Nutella" trade marks (including the "NUTELLA" word mark and the composite "nutella and
Singapore High Court assesses goodwill for "St. Regis" in Singapore
- ATMD Bird & Bird LLP
- -
- Singapore
- -
- November 27 2012
Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd (Staywell) is an Australian company which operates the “Park Regis” hotel brand
Infringing use of a trade mark in Singapore
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- June 29 2011
In the recent decision of City Chain Stores (S) Pte Ltd v. Louis Vuitton Malletier 2009 SGCA 53 (“City Chain v LVMH”), the Singapore Court of Appeal (“Court”) considered the issue of the types of use of a trade mark that would constitute an infringement of a registered trade mark under the Singapore Trade Marks Act (“the Act”
Anti-counterfeiting: understanding the nature of the problem
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- April 28 2011
Counterfeiting problems are unique and industry specific
Revocation of prior mark
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- March 29 2011
In Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd 2011 SGCA 6, the Court of Appeal considered precisely when a mark which was revoked from the register was no longer an 'earlier trade mark' when considering a fresh application for an identical mark
Tang Chay Seng v Tung Yang Wee Arthur 2010 4 SLR 1004: passing-off based on use of culinary awards
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- January 28 2011
In pork noodle seller's (the "Plaintiff") action against his nephew (the "Defendant") for trade mark infringement and passing-off, the Singapore High Court (the "Court") found that while infringement was not established, there was indeed passing-off in this case
Plea of mistake succeeds in the District Court
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- August 19 2010
In the recent case of Public Prosecutor v Chua Keng Fock 2010 SGDC 134, the District Court acquitted the Accused of charges brought under the Trade Marks Act (Cap. 332) on the ground that he had taken all reasonable precautions against committing the offence, and had no reason to suspect the genuineness of the goods
Nike trade mark registration allowed
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- July 8 2010
Under section 8(1) of the Singapore Trade Marks Act ("TMA"), one of the grounds on which a trade mark shall be refused registration is when such a trade mark is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark and is sought to be registered for similar goodsservices for which the earlier trade mark is protected
Valentino Globe loses in court of appeal
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- July 8 2010
In the recent decision of Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc 2010 SGCA 14, the Singapore Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the High Court in rejecting Valentino Globe BV's (the "Appellant") opposition to Pacific Rim Industries' (the "Respondent") application for the registration of its "Emilio Valentino & V Device" mark in Class 18
Protection of well known trade marks in Singapore
- Bird & Bird
- -
- Singapore
- -
- June 21 2010
On 31 March 2009, the Singapore Court of Appeal issued, in deciding whether a modest cluster housing project in Singapore should be allowed to use the same name as an exclusive luxury resort in Bali, a landmark decision on the protection of well known trade marks in Singapore
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Ankur Gupta (1)
- Cyril Chua (1)
- Huang Wenshan (1)
- Joyce Ang (1)
- Karol Goh (2)
- Oh Pin Ping (2)
- Terri Koh (1)
- Vikram Ramasamy (1)
