We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

The trademark audit: a necessary legal check-up

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2012

A few weeks ago, we said goodbye to 2011, welcomed 2012, and made some New Year’s resolutions whether it be to shed a few extra pounds, to quit smoking, or to complain less and laugh more

The trademark audit: a necessary legal checkup

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 26 2012

A few weeks ago, we said goodbye to 2011, welcomed 2012 and made some New Year’s resolutions whether it be to shed a few extra pounds, to quit smoking or to complain less and laugh more

Section 1(b) intent-to-use applications: evidence of bona fide intent required

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 15 2011

If you’re familiar with the federal registration of trademarks and service marks in the United States, you know that U.S. trademark law allows an applicant to seek registration of a mark based on either actual use of a mark in interstate commerce (15 U.S.C. Sec 1051(a)) or on a bona fide intent to use the mark in U.S. commerce (15 U.S.C. Sec 1051(b

Trademark letters of protest: no need to wait, protest now!

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 18 2011

If you or your company own any trademarks or service marks, you may discover one day that a competitor has applied to register a confusingly similar mark, is seeking registration of a generic or descriptive word, or is attempting to register a term of art for goods or services that are the subject of your business