We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 41

Preliminary injunction partially entered in trademark suit

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

Judge Kapala granted the agreed portions of plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction in this trademark case involving plaintiff’s 21ST CENTURY

Inadvertent use of mark violates consent order

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2013

Judge Bucklo granted plaintiff Gaither Tool’s motion to enforce the parties’ Consent Order which required that defendant Summit Tool not use the

“Special sharing” allows claims against corporate officer

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2013

Judge Finnegan denied individual defendant Lang’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & (6) motion to dismiss this Lanham Act suit. Lang argued that plaintiff Lang

Transfer warranted where all parties are in Florida

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 21 2012

Judge Coleman granted defendant’s motion to transfer this copyright and trademark infringement case to the M.D. Florida

Motion to dismiss conflicting with service affidavit raises “red flag”

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2012

Judge Shadur sua sponte raised several issues with defendant’s motion to dismiss in this trademark case

Default judgment makes case exceptional

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2012

Judge Shadur entered judgment in favor of plaintiff in this Lanham Act case

Oral settlement on the record is enforceable

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 17 2012

Judge Cox recommended granting plaintiff’s motion to enforce the parties’ oral agreement and denied defendant’s motion for declaration of the absence of an agreement in this trademark case

Unrebutted local Rule 56.1 statement leads to summary judgment

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2012

7-Eleven, Inc

Laches claims generally not grounds for dismissal

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

Judge Kennelly granted in part defendants’ (collectively “L&P”) motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims in this Lanham Act case in this dispute regarding trademarked bratwurst

Likelihood of confusion not conducive to summary judgment

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2012

Judge Coleman denied plaintiffs summary judgment as to their Lanham Act infringement, deceptive trade practices and unfair competition claims