We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 7,891

Top copyright and trademark infringement mistakes small businesses make (part 2 of 3)

  • Scott & Scott LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2015

The second mistake in this 3-part series applies to a broader range of businesses, and involves improperly licensed computer software. While there

Australian trademark opposition round-up 29 January 2015

  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • January 30 2015

An Australian Trademark Opposition Round-Up from the Trade Mark Office Journal dated 29 January 2015. If you wish to oppose the registration of trade

The Supreme Court resolves the role of the jury in trademark tacking

  • Vedder Price PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2015

The day after its ruling in Teva, the Supreme Court settled a split in the lower courts over whether the judge or the jury should make the

Top copyright and trademark infringement mistakes small businesses make (part 3 of 3)

  • Scott & Scott LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2015

While copyright infringement is a significant concern for many businesses, it is important that trademark infringement is not overlooked. The third

Coffee vs Cement: does being well-known deserve dilution protection?

  • Tsai Lee & Chen Patent Attorneys & Attorneys at Law
  • -
  • Taiwan
  • -
  • January 29 2015

A judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of Taiwan ended a well-known trademark dispute on June 19, 2014, in which the Court strongly

It's time to review your brands and trade marks!

  • McCullough Robertson
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • January 29 2015

When was the last time you reviewed your brand and trade mark portfolio in Australia and overseas? Are all of the brands used by your business

Hana Financial v. Hana Bank: Supreme Court holds that trademark “tacking” is a question for juries

  • Workman Nydegger
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 29 2015

On January 21, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, in which the Court considered the doctrine of

Supreme Court finds trademark tacking to be a jury question

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 29 2015

The Supreme Court of the United States, in a unanimous decision stated that “because the tacking inquiry operates from the perspective of the

TAKETEN and TAKE10! Can coexist without confusion

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 29 2015

The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (the Board) decision, concluding that the

No presumption, but inference of irreparable harm permissible under Lanham Act

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 29 2015

Addressing interpretation of advertising claims when the packaging or label unambiguously defines a claim term and an inference of irreparable harm