We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 8,339

Calcutta HC gives protection to trademark of foreign manufacturer of goods sold in India; importer unable to prove ownership of mark

  • Nishith Desai Associates
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • March 26 2015

In a recent case of Sunny Sales & Ors. (“Plaintiff”) v. Binod Khanna (“Defendant”)1, the Calcutta High Court ("Court"), refused to grant injunction in

Don’t count on another bite at the apple: Supreme Court rules that TTAB findings on ‘likelihood of confusion’ can preclude re-litigation in federal court

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

On March 24, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its much anticipated second trademark decision of the term, holding that US Trademark Trial and Appeal

Supreme Court holds that TTAB rulings can have preclusive effect in court

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries, ruling that decisions of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

U.S. Supreme Court raises the stakes in trademark proceedings at the TTAB

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

This week, the Supreme Court issued an important ruling that will significantly impact the way parties handle trademark disputes in the United States

“COCCINELLE” wins opposition appeal against “COCCI”

  • HFG Law & Intellectual Property
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • March 26 2015

COCCINELLE S.P.A. (the Opponent) is an Italian company operating in the business of fashion and accessories and it is the owner of the trademark

Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) reprimand Assistant Registrar for cryptic order in an opposition case

  • RNA, Intellectual Property Attorneys
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • March 26 2015

The observation was made in an opposition case concerning the mark NOMEX that was applied for registration by Galpha Laboratories, Mumbai (Galpha) in

B&B hardware: sometimes, not always, not never

  • Akerman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

The Supreme Court issued its second trademark ruling of the term on Tuesday, ruling that federal court decisions on "likelihood of confusion"

Dilution claim dismissed based on unreasonably delay

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

In a precedential Cancellation action, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB or Board) held that

No Lanham Act standing without U.S. trademark use or registration

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Addressing the issue of standing in a Cancellation action at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB

No acquiescence defense in Fifth Circuit without significant investment in reliance

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Clarifying that undue prejudice is a distinct requirement of the acquiescence defense, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the