We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 67

Three standards for standing under the Lanham Act, but only one will survive Supreme Court review

  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Static Control Components has standing under the Lanham Act to bring false

Protection of IPR in software copyright registration a viable alternative

  • RK Dewan & Co
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • June 3 2013

With the advent of the information age, software is increasingly being created and used to implement most forms of technology. However, it is seen

Intellectual property weekly abstracts bulletin

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The Supreme Court has dismissed Eli Lilly of Canada Inc.’s leave on the issue, as summarized by the Court, as to whether the creation by the Federal

Protecting software intellectual property: patent vs. copyright

  • Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

The explosive growth of web 2.0 sites and mobile applications has been changing the technology landscape in past couple of years. With companies

Don't snag your deals on traps laid for trolls

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

The issue of non-practicing entities has been back in the news again recently. During a Google hangout last week, President Barack Obama used strong

Copyright and patent implications of Supreme Court’s first sale doctrine ruling

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2013

In a 6-3 decision issued on March 19, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the first sale doctrine, which allows the owner of a "lawfully made"

Today’s update from the High Court IP special leave applications refused

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 15 2013

The High Court today heard special leave applications in two IP cases - however, in both cases Chief Justice French and Justice Gageler declined to

Patent trolls aren’t the only IP trolls in the forest: copyright trolls

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2013

Patent trolls - "non-practicing entities," which are companies that acquire patents with little or no intention of doing anything with the patents

Software rights - to share or to keep control?

  • D Young & Co
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 8 2013

In the United Kingdom, and in most countries, both the source code and object code of a computer program are automatically protected by copyright

IP snapshot - January 2013

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 25 2013

The CJEU has given its long-awaited and much-anticipated decision in the ONELOMEL case, which turned on the issue of the extent of geographical use

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy