We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 41

General counsel update: 31 May 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 31 2012

This is the twenty-ninth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

The London Olympic Association Right and ambush marketing

  • Penningtons Solicitors LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 30 2012

Traders could find themselves infringing the London Olympics Association Right if they use advertising to suggest to the public that there is an association between the London Olympics and their goods, services or business

You're getting sued for what? An E&O odyssey (Pt 8)

  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2012

This post is part of an occasional series highlighting the type of risks which film and TV producers face and which are supposed to be covered by E&O insurance

Copyright and trademark issues highlighted during recent controversy over Pinterest’s terms of service

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2012

Any company with an online presence, especially one that allows users or subscribers to post content or images, should carefully consider applicable intellectual property laws and take steps to ensure that its website’s terms of service are at all times appropriately tailored to provide adequate protection for the company while simultaneously serving the specific needs of the site and its users

Infringement of Nintendo games consoles triggers 4.5 million award

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • France
  • -
  • March 19 2012

The Paris Court of Appeal recently ruled in favour of Nintendo against retailers and importers of linker devices

Intellectual Property & Technology Update Winter 2012

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • March 8 2012

Welcome to the Winter 2012 issue of "Intellectual Property & Technology Update," a quarterly publication prepared by the members of Squire Sanders' intellectual property and technology law practice

Technology annual review of 2011

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 29 2012

The year began as it meant to go on - with a high profile patent dispute in the mobile phone sector decided in the Court of Appeal

"It's not personal, Sonny. It's strictly business."

  • Coats & Bennett PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 23 2012

It’s not wise to cross Don Corleone

Is SUPER BOWL protected by trademark or copyright law? Try both

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 19 2012

One of the questions we commonly get from broadcasters and others around this time of year is whether andor how they can use the term SUPER BOWL

2011 media year in review

  • Sedgwick LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 18 2012

2012 is here, and in our first issue in the New Year, the Media Law Bulletin is taking a look back at some interesting legal developments of 2011: the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's (DMCA) safe harbor provision concerning copyrighted material and on an Apple software license agreement; a Federal Circuit court permitted an accused infringer to use reexamination as a way to avoid liability for infringement; the Ninth Circuit ruled on how trademark holders protect their intellectual property; and a Federal Circuit decision on an appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) on whether friction-welding claims were obvious

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy