We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 45

U.S. Court of Appeals ruling protects ISPs from copyright infringement

  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2013

Internet service providers faced with possible copyright infringement lawsuits are cheering a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth

The 9th Circuit shows Luvdarts no love

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

Last week, the 9th Circuit affirmed the district court's decision in Luvdarts, LLC, et al. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al., dismissing with prejudice

Simplified pirate website blocking orders

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 1 2013

Yesterday, the High Court made a court order requiring BSkyB, British Telecom, Everything Everywhere, TalkTalk, Telefonica and Virgin Media to block

TMT past, present and future: UKEU review of 2012 and preview of 2013

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 15 2013

No duty to monitor" extended to social networks: In February 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ") ruled that the owner of an

District court continues to prohibit the "reflashing" or "unlocking" of cellular devices

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 19 2012

The U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida recently ruled that the unauthorized "unlocking" or "reflashing" of cellular devices, a process that

Stored Communications Act and internet service providers

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

Working within the confines of the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”), plaintiffs have continued to seek information from Internet Service Providers (ISPs) from which they can identify individual end users associated with Internet Protocol (IP) addresses

Lawyers debate applicability of Cablevision decision to Aereo case

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 8 2012

During oral arguments on the broadcast networks’ request for a preliminary injunction to shut down the Aereo web streaming service, a Manhattan federal district court judge questioned the networks on the extent to which the Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. CSC Holdings applies to the case at hand

Final credits roll in iiNet trilogy

  • Hunt & Hunt
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 11 2012

In a landmark ruling on 20 April 2012, the High Court unanimously dismissed an appeal by 34 Australian and United States film and television studios against internet service provider (“ISP”) iiNet

Movie studios fail in appeal against internet service providers

  • Piper Alderman
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 10 2012

The High Court has unanimously decided that an internet service provider, iiNet, is not liable for authorising the copyright infringements by its users who downloaded movies on its network

CMS quarterly communications update April 2012

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • Austria, Bulgaria, European Union, Germany, Global, Hungary, Iran, Italy, Poland, Serbia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 30 2012

This edition includes contributions from the United Kingdom, Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Serbia, Spain, Switzerland and Ukraine

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy