We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

Copyright exceptions: major expansion to reflect Hargreaves recommendations

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 16 2013

The Government launched a consultation in December 2011 to canvass views on expanding the list of copyright exceptions or "permitted acts" under the

IP snapshot

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 21 2012

The High Court has refused to grant a stay of proceedings for infringement of a Community Trade Mark under Article 104(1) of the CTM Regulation where there were parallel proceedings before OHIM

Copyright Hub - the future of licensing and other reforms

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 9 2012

Richard Hooper’s “Phase 2” report on copyright licensing was published on 31 July 2012, recommending the creation of a not-for-profit industry led and funded “Copyright Hub” to facilitate copyright education and licensing, to be overseen by a new steering group

IP snapshot

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 19 2012

The CJEU has ruled on the questions referred to it following the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorney’s appeal against the refusal to allow its registration of “IP TRANSLATOR” in relation to Class 41 of the Nice Classification

IP snapshot march 2012

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 3 2012

TRADE MARKS

IP snapshot: August 2011

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 26 2011

Bringing you regular news of key developments in intellectual property law

IP snapshot May 2011

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 23 2011

The High Court has passed down judgment in relation to a judicial review brought by two of the UK's largest Internet Service Providers, relating to the legality and proportionality of the Digital Economy Act