Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-5 of 5
Copyright infringement in the world of celebrity blogging: X17, inc. v. Hollywood.com, LLC
- Arent Fox LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 14 2010
On November 5, 2010, X17, Inc., a paparazzi photo agency, filed suit against Hollywood.com, LLC, owner, operator, and publisher of a series of popular celebrity fan sites and blogs, including www.hollywood.com and www.worldofjustin.com (dedicated to all things Justin Timberlake
Who owns Superman? Copyright lawsuit over Superman comics continues
- Arent Fox LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 12 2012
Litigation is ongoing in California federal courts between the heirs of Joe Shuster, the co-creator of the famous Superman comic book, and DC Comics, the division of Warner Bros. that held the rights to the Superman comics for more than 60 years
Weighing-in on copyright infringement: NBC wins summary judgment in The Biggest Loser copyright infringement suit
- Arent Fox LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 1 2011
On February 22, 2011, Judge Alvin Hellerstein of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York threw out a copyright infringement suit regarding NBC's popular reality series The Biggest Loser
Seventh Circuit case regarding copyright liability for embedding infringing videos brings major industry players to the table as amici
- Arent Fox LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 1 2012
What started as a copyright litigation between two relatively minor parties has morphed into an appeal before the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that has seen amici briefs from the likes of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), Google, and Facebook
Decision against NBC Universal for use of pitched television show concept without compensationcredit being appealed to Supreme Court
- Arent Fox LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 10 2011
Major players in the entertainment industry should be aware of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc., 649 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2011), a case regarding a pitch for a television show concept
