We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

Internet and web-browsing: the importance of copyright assignments and potential vicarious liability for employers

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 2 2012

A recent decision from the British Columbia Supreme Court, discussed widely for its application of internet and intellectual property law, also contains some legal implications that Canadian employers should be aware of

Canada’s copyright reform

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 20 2010

After failed attempts in 2006 and 2008, the government tabled the Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-32) in the House of Commons in June of this year

Danger in what isn't: IP law

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 20 2010

"It's not what you don't know that causes all the trouble, it's what you know for sure that isn't so"

Appropriation of personality

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 27 2012

For some time courts have struggled to find a way to address cases where one person's personality has been used without permission by another for his own purposes

Copyright Reform Bill C - 11

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 29 2012

After several failed attempts, the federal government has finally passed copyright reform legislation, namely Bill C-11, the Copyright Modernization Act

Fair is foul and foul is fair: lifting the fog around fair dealing in Canadian copyright law

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 31 2012

Canada's copyright regime has recently been subject to a great deal of transformation as a result of the amendments introduced by the Copyright Modernization Act as well as the five copyright decisions released by the Supreme Court of Canada on July 12, 2012

Knockout blow to knockoffs

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 20 2011

In Louis Vuitton and Burberry v Singga Enterprises, the Federal Court has delivered a stern warning to those engaging in counterfeiting luxury goods in Canada by awarding an aggregate of $1.98 million in damages for trade-mark and copyright infringement and a further $0.5 million in punitive damages

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy