We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 141

Covenants not to sue and implied “have made” rights; Global Communications v. DirecTV

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2014

On February 28, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida granted summary judgment to DirecTV, Inc. in Global Communications

Senate hearing postponed on McCaskill bad faith patent assertion bill

  • Woods Rogers plc
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2014

The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation hearing to consider S.2049, Sen. McCaskill's (D-Mo.) bill to curb unfair and

Senate judiciary to mark-up leahy patent reform bill

  • Woods Rogers plc
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2014

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to begin mark-up of S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013 at 10:00 a.m. on

AOD-9604: patents, peptides, performance and.cellulite?

  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 14 2013

Australia is no stranger to sporting scandals. Cricket's "John the bookmaker" affair, horse racing's "Fine Cotton" scandal and any number of player

U.S. Patent No. 7,697,015: storage medium and game device storing image generating program

  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2013

The '015 patent attempts to fix a common problem experienced by most gamers. In past games when the camera is placed directly behind a character, the

Internet advertising method found to be patent-eligible

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a method for distributing online media to consumers by having the consumer first watch a paid advertisement constitutes patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101

May edition of notable cases and events in e-discovery

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2013

This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: A Northern District of Illinois ruling

Jury rules that Google infringed copyright: but was it fair?

  • Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 18 2012

A Californian jury has ruled that the Android mobile platform, which is operated by Google Inc, infringes copyright relating to the Java programming language, which is owned by Oracle Corp

Oppa lawyer style: protecting IP rights in a viral video

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • South Korea
  • -
  • October 1 2012

The creators of ‘Gangnam Style’, the K-Pop video by Korean rapper PSY, which went viral after being released in July, are reportedly facing a trade mark fight in the Korean Intellectual Property Office over rights to the commercial use of the name ‘Gangnam Style’

Motion to dismiss denied where claim for joint infringement was not at issue in complaint

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 18 2012

Plaintiff Intertainer, Inc. brought an action for patent infringement against Defendant Hulu, LLC