We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 148

Reply affidavits allowed when new documents introduced in responding evidence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 9 2014

In this case, there is a partial reversal of evidence. Apotex brought a motion for leave to file reply evidence. Allergan did not oppose parts of the

Patent held invalid for not meeting promise of improved therapeutic profile

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 10 2014

Apotex was successful in the previous NOC Proceeding. It came to market with an esomeprazole product. AstraZeneca sued for patent infringement and

Failure to produce evidence of development leads to adverse inference on obviousness

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 9 2014

These proceedings, brought pursuant to the NOC Regulations, dealt with two patents. One set of reasons was issued. The application was granted in

Court grants motion to reopen trial and admit new evidence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 27 2011

The Federal Court granted leave to reopen the trial and admit new evidence in a matter under reserve, in which no reasons or judgement have issued

Interlocutory injunction denied

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 29 2011

This was a motion for an interlocutory injunction

FCA refuses to stay injunction order

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 10 2014

Janssen and Abbvie were involved in a patent infringement action. Abbvie was successful in its claim for infringement, and the patent was held to be

The Federal Court finds two generic company's allegations to be unjustified

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 10 2014

Two PM(NOC) decisions relating to the same patent were recently released by the Federal Court. In both cases, the applications were allowed

Appeal upholds dismissal of request to amend pleadings due to proximity to trial

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 4 2014

This case concerns an appeal of a motion to amend pleadings in the s. 8 case described above. The motion had originally been brought three months

The Court of Appeal sends s.8 case back to trial judge for redetermination

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 26 2012

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) has granted Apotex’ appeal and sent a case considering s. 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the Regulations) back to the Trial Judge for redetermination

Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Novopharm, The Minister of Health, Northwestern University and the Board of Regents for the University of Oklahoma

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 5 2010

In a proceeding pursuant to the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations, Novopharm brought a motion seeking a Protective Order that allowed the designation of Novopharm's Notice of Allegation (NOA) as confidential