We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 168

Motion for particulars in action under section 8 denied as not necessary

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 1 2015

Pfizer brought a motion in an action brought pursuant to section 8 of the Patented Medicines(Notice of Compliance) Regulations seeking to strike

Motion for reply evidence granted in part

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 1 2015

This is an appeal from the decision of a Prothonotary, denying leave to file reply evidence in a proceeding pursuant to the Patented Medicines

Court of Appeal upholds decision relating to sildenafil use patent

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 27 2014

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v. Apotex Inc., 2014 FCA 13 Drug: VIAGRA sildenafil In Apotex' action for impeachment of the Pfizer patent

Apotex v. Lundbeck

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 31 2010

Lundbeck was successful in obtaining a Prohibition Order preventing Apotex from coming to market until after the expiration of one of its patents

Apotex v. Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 13 2010

In a patent impeachment proceeding, the Court considered an appeal of a motion refusing to strike certain defences from the statement of defence

Court of Appeal strikes paragraphs relating to issue estoppel and abuse of process from statement of defence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 21 2011

The Court of Appeal heard an appeal from the Motions Judge where the majority of impugned paragraphs in the Statement of Defence were allowed to stand

Court grants motion to reopen trial and admit new evidence

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 27 2011

The Federal Court granted leave to reopen the trial and admit new evidence in a matter under reserve, in which no reasons or judgement have issued

Pleadings for disgorgement of profits and for an accounting of profits in s.8 damages not struck in Ontario court

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 1 2012

In this case, Apotex has claimed damages in Ontario Court pursuant to, inter alia, section 8 of the NOC Regulations. Lilly brought a motion to strike out parts of Apotex’ statement of claim

Finding of "fair expectation of success" leads to finding of obviousness

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 11 2013

Teva sent two Notices of Allegation, one in respect of 50mg tablets and the second in respect of 150, 200, 300 and 400mg tablets, which were addressed

The Court grants an innovator standing and the right to be made a party in a judicial Review of the Minister’s Decision relating to the application of the data protection regime

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 26 2014

This was a motion that raised the issue of an innovator’s standing and right to be made a party to a judicial review of the Minister of Health’s