Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 142
Federal Circuit issues fractured affirmance in CLS Bank v. Alice Corporation
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 12 2013
In a fractured en banc decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's holding that the claims at issue in CLS Bank v. Alice Corporation
Dispelling the Myriad gene patent harmonization myth
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- Australia, Canada, European Union, France, Germany, Japan, USA
- -
- April 30 2013
In the wake of the Supreme Court oral arguments in the Myriad "gene patent" case, most commentators are predicting that the Court will uphold the
Federal Circuit upholds one claim covering Combigan
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 7 2013
In Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court in part, finding that Allergan's composition claims and most of
Supreme Court finds for Monsanto in seed harvesting case
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 16 2013
In Bowman v. Monsanto Co., the Supreme Court held that the doctrine of patent exhaustion does not give a farmer who has bought patented seeds the
Federal Circuit holds that patent indefiniteness requires insoluble ambiguousness
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 2 2013
In Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's finding that the claims at issue were invalid as
Supreme Court oral arguments in ACLU Myriad gene patent case
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 15 2013
On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in one of the most controversial and publicized biotech patent cases-the "ACLUMyriad" gene
Federal Circuit applies “four corners” test for incorporation by reference to support priority date
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 12 2012
In Hollmer v. Harari, the Federal Circuit clarified the requirements for incorporation by reference of subject matter required to support a priority claim under 35 USC 120
Pinpointing invention conception date in a patent interference
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 9 2013
In Dawson v. Dawson, the Federal Circuit considered an unusual case with a question that often arises in interferences: when did the inventor invent
Challenging the enabling quality of Prior Art
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 18 2013
In In re Morsa, the Federal Circuit reversed an anticipation rejection where the applicant had challenged the enabling quality of the cited prior art
The Federal Circuit hears oral arguments in Myriad isolated DNA case
- Foley & Lardner LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 4 2011
On April 4, 2011, Judges Lourie, Bryson, and Moore at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, No. 09-Civ-4515, i.e., the ACLUMyriad “gene patenting” case
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Antoinette F. Konski (2)
- Jacqueline D. Wright Bonilla (5)
- Jeanne M. Gills (5)
- Kristel Schorr (2)
- Liane M. Peterson (1)
- Stephen B. Maebius (4)
- Steven J. Rizzi (1)
