We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Market definition critical to summary judgment determination in casino games case

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2013

Addressing market definition issues in the context of Sherman Act antitrust claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a

Double patenting sinks Gemzar method of use claims

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2010

Affirming the district court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reiterated its precedent that “a claim to a method of using a composition is not patentably distinct from an earlier claim to the identical composition in a patent disclosing the identical use” and confirmed that its holding “extends to any and all such uses disclosed in the specification of the earlier patent.”

Commission declines review of remand ID, terminates Inv. No. 650

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 13 2010

The Commission declined review today of a May 27, 2010 initial determination by ALJ Gildea, finding no violation of Section 337 with respect to one patent, and terminated Inv. No. 337-TA-650, Certain Coaxial Cable Connectors and Components Thereof and Products Containing Same