We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Stanford v. Roche: the return of “talismanic incantations”

  • Burns & Levinson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2011

In reviewing the manner in which Miranda warnings are given, the Supreme Court has stated that there are no “talismanic incantations;” however, as the case of Stanford v. Roche indicates, the language used in employmentcontractorconsultant agreements can have a very large impact on the interpretation and effect of the agreement

Bayh-Dole doesn’t block wedding when researcher who promised invention to Stanford says “I do” to Roche

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 8 2011

The Supreme Court held Monday, 7-2, in a decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts that the Bayh-Dole Act does not automatically vest title to federally funded inventions in federal contractors or unilaterally authorize contractors to take title to such inventions

Employment law update - August 2011 supplemental

  • Nexsen Pruet
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 11 2011

On June 6, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Stanford Univ. v. Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., No. 09-1159

Bayh-DoleAact does not automatically vest title to federally funded inventions in federal contractors

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 26 2011

In Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., No. 09-1159 (U.S. June 6, 2011), the Supreme Court held that the University and Small Business Patent Procedures Act of 1980 (the “Bayh-Dole Act” or “Act”) does not automatically vest title to federally funded inventions in federal contractors or authorize contractors to unilaterally take title to such inventions

Noteworthy cases in the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 term

  • Larkin Hoffman
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 21 2011

The first Monday in October represents the start of a new term for the United States Supreme Court

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy