Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 96
Teva Canada Innovation v. Attorney General of Canada
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- May 8 2013
The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (the PMPRB) ordered Teva to pay the Crown approximately $2.4 million for selling its product at an
Intellectual property weekly abstracts bulletin
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- April 1 2013
The Court granted a Prohibition Order to AstraZeneca, preventing Ranbaxy from entering the market with a generic version of ompeprazole until the
NOC proceeding dismissed on the basis of overbreadth and a lack of sound prediction
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- February 13 2013
In this case, one claim of a patent was at issue in the proceeding. The claim related to the use of pregabalin or its racemate to treat pain. The
Ontario Court dismisses generic claims for unjust enrichment in s. 8 proceeding
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- January 30 2013
Apotex sued Abbott and Takeda for damages pursuant to s. 8 of the NOC Regulations. As part of the claim, Apotex claimed disgorgement of profits
Court dismisses NOC proceeding for mootness when NOA withdrawn
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- January 30 2013
Lilly brought an application for prohibition pursuant to the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. Subsequently, Teva established to
Judicial review brought outside time period and no vested right to NOC
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- January 23 2013
This decision relates to the consideration by the Minister of Health of Apotex’ submission for a Notice of Compliance (NOC) for omeprazole magnesium
Definition of “innovative drug” does not include variations
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- January 23 2013
This is an appeal by Takeda of a decision of the Court, in which the Court upheld the decision of the Minister of Health to refuse to list Takeda’s
Impeachment action in respect of expired patent allowed to continue
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- December 17 2012
Apotex commenced an impeachment action in respect of two patents. Warner-Lambert brought a motion seeking to dismiss the action as it related to one patent
Court of Appeal considers comity as it applies to NOC proceedings
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- December 4 2012
Apotex v
Motion to determine preliminary question of law dismissed
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- November 21 2012
Pfizer brought a motion to have the Court determine a question of law before or at the outset of the trial of the action
Current Search
- Workarea - Patents
- Workarea - Healthcare
- Workarea - Litigation
- Firm Name - Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- Jurisdiction - Canada
- Author - Beverley Moore