We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Continued employment is sufficient consideration for IP assignment agreements

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2012

Addressing the issue of patent ownership in the employment context, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that an employment contract executed after the employee began working for the employer operated to automatically assign the rights to two patents to the employer with no additional consideration other than continued employment

Even under Bayh-Dole, employee inventor has first dibs

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 7 2011

The Supreme Court of the United States recently delivered a blow to the university technology transfer world by holding 7-2 that federal contractors do not have an automatic right to claim title to inventions

Even under Bayh-Dole, employee inventor has first dibs

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2011

In its second affirmance of a Federal Circuit decision in the span of two weeks, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a blow to the university technology transfer world, held (7-2) that federal contractors do not have an automatic right to claim title to inventions