We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 162

CAFC finds that adapting well-known methods of doing business to the Internet is obvious as a matter of law

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2013

Sovereign brought a patent infringement suit against Newegg for infringement of certain claims in three U.S. patents, all relating to electronic

Induced infringement: Federal Circuit joint AkamaiMckesson decision changes the law

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2013

For years, courts have struggled with the concept of induced infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that "whoever actively induces infringement

Summary judgment that Google’s Street View does not infringe is reversed

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 28 2014

In Vederi, LLC v. Google, Inc., Appeal No. 13-1057, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's claim construction and finding of

Business law update - Spring 2014

  • Thompson Hine LLP
  • -
  • Canada, China, Germany, Japan, USA
  • -
  • March 24 2014

With deals today being larger and more global than ever before, a merger between two U.S. companies may have far-reaching effects in countries around

When big iron meets big data: unlocking value creation opportunities in the Internet of Things

  • Foresight Valuation Group LLC
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • June 25 2014

The physical world is becoming an information system, where connected objects and devices can both sense the environment and communicate data. The

On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related

Post-Alice Federal Circuit finds internet advertising method to not be patent eligible

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2014

Citing the Supreme Court of the United States’ Spring 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Internet advertising patent saga continues: Supreme Court orders Federal Circuit to reconsider decision in Ultramercial v. Hulu

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2012

In a brief, one paragraph order issued on May 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court hinted that a recent decision covering patent-eligibility for medical testing methods is also relevant to Internet-based methods

USPTO takes the MPEP to the wikisphere

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2011

As the USPTO begins the process of updating the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) and the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP), it is inviting public comment on specific sections through new "online discussion tools."

Federal Court of Appeal sends Amazon one-click patent application back to commissioner of patents

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 30 2011

On November 24, 2011, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in Canada (AG) v. Amazon.com, Inc., directing that the Commissioner of Patents resume the examination of Amazon.com’s patent application in accordance with the Court’s reasons. In so doing, the ultimate patentability of Amazon.com’s claims in the application remains to be determined, subject to the Commissioner’s particular application of the Court’s reasons