We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 186

With "one click", business methods are patentable in Canada

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 15 2010

In a decision of the Federal Court of Canada released on October 14, 2010, Amazon.com, Inc. v. Attorney General of Canada, the Court allowed an appeal from a ruling by the Commissioner of Patents ("Commissioner") that had originally denied a patent application by Amazon.com Inc. ("Amazon") for its pervasively successful one click online ordering technology

Amazon one-click application ordered back to Patent Office for re-examination: a litigation perspective

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 28 2011

On November 24, 2011, the Federal Court of Appeal issued its decision in Canada (Attorney General) v. Amazon.com, Inc. (2011 FCA 338) (Amazon

Internet advertising method found to be patent-eligible

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a method for distributing online media to consumers by having the consumer first watch a paid advertisement constitutes patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101

Amazon.com’s Canadian “one-click” patent on the threshold of issuance

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 6 2012

This past year was truly an important year for Canadian decisions on business method patents, both from the Court and the Commissioner of Patents, and these decisions are receiving rapid attention

Patentable subject matter clarity or prolonged confusion?

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 21 2011

It’s back to the “check-out” counter for Amazon.com’s (Amazon) “one-click” patent application

Internet advertising patent saga continues: Supreme Court orders Federal Circuit to reconsider decision in Ultramercial v. Hulu

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2012

In a brief, one paragraph order issued on May 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court hinted that a recent decision covering patent-eligibility for medical testing methods is also relevant to Internet-based methods

U.S. Supreme Court orders Federal Circuit to reconsider online advertising patent decision

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 20 2012

In several recent cases involving subject matter as diverse as genes, medical diagnosis, and online advertising, the U.S. Supreme Court appears to be trying to narrow the boundaries of patent-eligible subject matter defined by the Federal Circuit

Follow the yellow bit road?: JP Morgan pursues bitcoin-like patent

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • China, European Union, USA
  • -
  • December 19 2013

Digital currencies are a hot topic these days, with their anonymity, freedom from control by centralised banks, and avoidance of merchant transaction

Post-Alice Federal Circuit finds internet advertising method to not be patent eligible

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2014

Citing the Supreme Court of the United States’ Spring 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Federal Circuit’s post-Alice eligibility analysis of business methods

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 16 2014

The Federal Circuit in Ultramercial, Inc. v. WildTangent, Inc., held that an "entrepreneurial" multi-step process for distributing copyrighted media