We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 10

Chief Judge Kozinski rules in favor of Google finding Street View did not infringe Vederi's patents

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

Vederi owns several patents which cover certain methods for enabling users to navigate a geographic area visually from a device, including a personal computer

Rembrandt v. Facebook: district court excludes damage expert where expert failed to apportion damages to patented features in accused product

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 11 2013

Rembrandt Social Media, LP ("Rembrandt") filed a patent infringement action against Facebook alleging that Facebook infringed two of its patents

Motion to dismiss denied under Bilski where plaintiff contended that a computer programmed in a particular way was the invention itself

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2011

Plaintiff's complaint alleged a single count for patent infringement, which asserted that the defendant infringes its patent through the use of an online dating website

Motion to dismiss denied where claim for joint infringement was not at issue in complaint

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 18 2012

Plaintiff Intertainer, Inc. brought an action for patent infringement against Defendant Hulu, LLC

Multidistrict panel denies transfer in patent infringement action involving multiple defendants and patents in different district courts

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 26 2011

Plaintiffs asserted patents relating to computer-based messaging products and services against numerous defendants, including Facebook, LinkedIn, ETrade and Verizon in two different district courts

WiFi "sniffing" ruled not a violation of the Wiretap Act where patent holder sought to collect information that was available over public WiFi networks

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2012

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC ("Innovatio") filed patent infringement actions against various hotels, coffee shops, restaurants and supermarkets for the use of wireless Internet technology located throughout the United States

Methods claims for e-mail processing survive a challenge to patentability under Bilski

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 5 2011

Plaintiff, Innova Patent Licensing, LLC ("Innova") filed a patent infringement action against Alcatel-Lucent Holdings ("Alcatel") for a patent claiming methods for using a mail processing program to scan electronic messages to obtain additional information

ESPN loses affirmative defenses and invalidity counterclaim on motion to dismiss but court recognizes unfairness in allowing "bare-bones" infringement complaint while prohibiting defendants from pleading affirmative defenses with brevity

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 19 2012

PageMelding filed a patent infringement action against ESPN asserting a patent that enables internet service and content providers to form mutually beneficial collaborations where website content is customized in accordance with those collaborations

The Federal Circuit continues to re-define what constitutes patentable subject matter under Section 101 after Bilski

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 27 2012

Bancorp Services, LLC (“Bancorp”) owns two United States patents, the 5,926,792 (“the ’792 patent”) and the 7,249,037 (“the ’037 patent”), both of which are entitled “System for Managing a Stable Value Protected Investment Plan.”

Summary judgment on indefiniteness denied where claims reciting term of "engine for" was not a means-plus-function term

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 6 2011

Defendant contended that several claims of a patent were indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112, 2