We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 18,092

Claim disclaimers as a strategy to avoid covered business method reviews

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2015

The America Invents Act ("AIA") enacted two powerful post-grant review tools for accused patent infringers: inter partes review ("IPR") and covered

Relying on printed publications in an IPR: potential pitfalls for the unwary

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2015

In challenging the patentability of an issued patent through inter partes review ("IPR"), petitioners are limited to relying on prior art patents and

SAP and SEP via the SEM - progress toward a unitary filingexamination process for Australia and New Zealand patent aplications

  • Shelston IP
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • April 16 2015

Single Economic Market ("SEM") reforms between the governments of Australia and New Zealand have now reached a point whereby a single application

DOJ continues to focus on FRAND negotiations

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

Citing a recent spike in litigation over fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory patent royalties as evidence that the current system is “not

Boston Scientific files second IPR petition against UAB Patent

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

Boston Scientific Corporation ("Boston Scientific") filed a petition with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on April 10, 2015 requesting inter partes

USPTO makes changes to AIA post grant proceedings

  • Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will be making a series of rule changes to America Invents Act reviews. Some will be effective immediately

“Upselling” patent case against Amazon dismissed

  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

On March 25, 2015, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a patent infringement case against Amazon.com Inc., saying that the patent at issue covered

IP Court to define boundary of equivalents protection in recent case

  • Tsai Lee & Chen Patent Attorneys & Attorneys at Law
  • -
  • Taiwan
  • -
  • April 16 2015

A decision by the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court (IP Court) was released on October 9th, 2014 to address the applicability of the doctrine of

Munchkin v. Luv N’Care CAFC affirms PTAB

  • OBLON
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

On April 14, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision that Luv N'

PTAB decides that mere common sense is not sufficient in lieu of expert testimony

  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

In its Inter Partes Review Final Written Decision, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) found that Petitioner had shown by a preponderance of