We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 17,888

No collateral challenge of patent application revival

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

In Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC v. Lee, the Federal Circuit held that the USPTO's decision to revive a patent application &8220;is not subject to

Court invalidates four HP patents under Alice

  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

A California federal judge invalidated four out of eight technology patents that Hewlett-Packard accused a competitor of infringing. HP claimed that

IP in depth: patentable biotechnology a comparative analysis of key markets

  • Fisher Adams Kelly
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, New Zealand, USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

There is extraordinary complexity and optimization underlying even comparatively 'simple' organisms. These powerful biological products and processes

Anticipatory reference need not perform claimed combination; no nexus where unexpected results stem from something other than the merits of the claimed invention

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

Federal Circuit affirms PTAB’s determinations of anticipation and obviousness in inter partes reexamination of patent directed to cutting tools

Patent reform: the changes looming in the latest bills

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

A second patent reform bill has been introduced in Congress. On March 3, Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), and Mazie Hirono

The motivation to combine references: substantial evidence and the obviousness examination guidelines

  • Wyatt Tarrant & Combs LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

A recent opinion by a Federal Circuit panel demonstrates that three years can be a long time in the smartphone industry. MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v

Canada PM(NOC) decision: Federal Court judge criticizes “very sketchy” disclosure in a CIALIS patent

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 30 2015

On February 2, 2015 Justice de Montigny of the Federal Court released his judgment and reasons in Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC

District court grants motion to dismiss for lack of standing on the eve of trial

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

Plaintiff Labyrinth Optical Technologies LLC ("Labyrinth") filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. ("Lucent"

Cambodia recognises first Singapore patent

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Cambodia, Singapore
  • -
  • March 30 2015

On 4 March 2015, the first Singapore patent was granted protection and recognised in Cambodia. Described as a landmark application in a press release

FDA denies Amgen’s Citizen’s Petition awaiting guidance from the courts

  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

As we have discussed before (here and here), the first generation of biosimilar litigation under the Biologics Price Control and Innovation Act