We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 9,092

After final rejection pilot program revamped by USPTO

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

Some pre- grant news of note this week. Last Friday the USPTO announced the After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0 (Federal Register Notice here

La patente europea con efecto unitario (i)

  • Gómez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 21 2013

El presente documento ofrece respuesta a una serie de preguntas sobre los aspectos básicos de la patente europea con efecto unitario. 1

Patent watch: Dey, L.P. V. Sunovion Pharms., Inc.

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

"An agreement of confidentiality, or circumstances creating a similar expectation of secrecy, may negate a 'public use' where there is not

Still no concrete approach for patent eligibility of computer-related inventions in the US

  • AJ Park
  • -
  • New Zealand, USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In a much awaited decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has released the results of its en banc hearing of CLS Bank International v

Gunn v. Minton: malpractice claims involving patent issues do not create exclusive federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1338

  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

28 U.S.C. 1138 provides that federal courts shall have jurisdiction over any case "arising under any act of Congress relating to patents" and

ALJ Pender issues order partially terminating investigation in Certain Electronic Devices Including Mobile Phones and Tablet Computers (337-TA-847)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On May 14, 2013, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 14 partially terminating the investigation in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile

ALJ Bullock terminates investigation based on settlement agreement in Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets (337-TA-855)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On May 14, 2013, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 106 in Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets, Methods of Making Same and Products

Revisiting efficacy: case study I

  • Ranjan Narula Associates
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Section 3 (d) of the Indian Patent Act has generated quite a buzz in recent times at various Intellectual Property forums and events, where the

Inter Partes Review

  • Blank Rome LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Inter Partes Review is a new post-grant proceeding created by the AIA for challenging a patent. Inter Partes Review replaces and improves upon Inter

NDCA issues order on early damages disclosure

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On March 8, 2013, the NDCA issued an opinion in Eon Corp. IP Holding LLC v. Sensus USA Inc., No. C-12-01011 EMC (EDL) (Doc. No. 657), concerning