We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 9,536

Supreme Court sides with Monsanto on issue of patent protection for genetically modified seeds: ruling is a major victory for the biotechnology industry

  • Vedder Price PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

In a ruling that has implications for a number of industries, including agriculture and biotechnology, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously on May 13

Update in the US Supreme Court landmark myriad gene patent case

  • Shelston IP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 11 2013

A decision is expected later this month from the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc., which

US and European approaches to antibody patents

  • FB Rice
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • June 13 2013

When monoclonal antibodies were first produced in 1974, Kohler and Milstein predicted that they “could be valuable for medical and industrial use”

Three standards for standing under the Lanham Act, but only one will survive Supreme Court review

  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Static Control Components has standing under the Lanham Act to bring false

Supreme Court decision in association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 13 2013

In a much-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court today issued its opinion in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. Justice

Induced infringement: Federal Circuit joint AkamaiMckesson decision changes the law

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2013

For years, courts have struggled with the concept of induced infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that "whoever actively induces infringement

A Kiwi-sized spanner in the works of the TPP?

  • Shelston IP
  • -
  • Asia-Pacific, Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • June 7 2013

We have previously reported on progress toward the Trans-Pacific Partnership ("TPP") - a Free Trade Agreement ("FTA") presently under negotiation by

Latest developments in standards, patents and FRAND licensing

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 13 2013

Since the publication of the European Commission's revised Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the

Obama moves to curb patent trolls - but beware of unintended consequences

  • DLA Piper
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 11 2013

President Barack Obama has announced a new executive and legislative initiative aimed at curbing patent infringement suits by "patent trolls," who

Delaware Supreme Court confirms liability for failure to negotiate in good faith

  • White & Case LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 3 2013

On appeal from the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Supreme Court, in SIGA Technologies, Inc. v. PharmAthene, Inc., recently held that an