We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 7,064

Urgent new patent law considerations

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 21 2012

As you may know, the America Invents Act (AIA) has key amendments to the patent law effective March 16, 2013 that will convert our patent system to a

U.S. patent law change effective March 16, 2013

  • Faegre Baker Daniels
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2013

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) has already brought about changes to the U.S. patent system, including increased U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

Apple v. Samsung: Apple loses bid for permanent injunction against Samsung because it cannot show nexus between harm and patented features

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 24 2012

Apple suffered yet another set back in the Smartphone wars, this time losing its motion for a permanent injunction against Samsung. The district court

Micro entity rules to become effective March 19, 2013

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2013

On Wednesday, December 19, 2012, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published final rules in the Federal Register to implement the micro entity

ALJ Gildea denies motion to preclude claim construction arguments in Certain Mobile Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics (337-TA-834)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2013

On December 13, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 22 (dated December 3, 2012) denying Respondents' motion to preclude

Ex parte Inosaka and Muraoka

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2011

The independent claim at issue in this case is a medical non-crosslinked pressure-sensitive adhesive composition which comprises a particular adhesive polymer A and a particular adhesive polymer B

False marking update: the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning?

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2011

In late 2009, the Federal Circuit’s unexpected opinion in Forest Group, Inc. v. Bon Tool Co. spawned a flood of false marking cases

Senate to debate patent reform after cloture vote

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 6 2011

The Senate is scheduled to debate patent reform on Wednesday September 7, 2011

Patent reform passes the Senate

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 8 2011

The Senate passed the America Invents Act (the "AIA") this evening without amendment

Why the Bilski decision matters in Australia

  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • July 21 2010

In 2009 more than 2,200 patent applications were filed directly in the United States by Australian entities, while nearly 1,500 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications designating the United States were filed by Australian entities

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy