We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 7,014

The Supreme Court unanimously splits the baby in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated opinion in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., unanimously

Supreme Court rules that isolated human gene is not patent eligible in AMP v. Myriad

  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

On June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., that an isolated but otherwise

US Supreme Court affirms patentee's rights in plant biotech case

  • AJ Park
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

The Bowman vs. Monsanto Co case, which was decided last month, has generated more public interest than most in recent years. The case deals with the

United States Supreme Court sets genes free

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

In a decision awaited with considerable trepidation by the biotech world, among others, on June 13, 2013 the Supreme Court handed down its unanimous

Supreme Court holds cDNA, but not isolated genes, patentable

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

A unanimous Supreme Court issued its decision yesterday in the closely-watched Myriad case, Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics

Supreme Court uses a fundamental rule to resolve Myriad complexities in yesterday’s gene patent holding

  • Coats & Bennett PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

Medical research heads into the realm of sci-fi as it begins predicting whether an individual might suffer from specific diseases based on

The protesters were right no one can patent their genes

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision holding that genes are not patentable, even when there are isolated from the body. The case

US Supreme Court rules naturally occurring DNA is not patentable

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

For almost 30 years, the United States Patent and Trademark Office has been granting patents directed to "isolated DNA." On June 13, 2013, in

U.S. Supreme Court's Myriad decision on DNA patents is in

  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

The Supreme Court has held that "isolated" nucleic acids that correspond to naturally-occurring sequences are not eligible for patenting, but that

Maximizing the value of pre-AIA patent applications using first-to-file regime part I

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

The first-to-file provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) took effect on March 16, 2013. The predominant view among patent